High Court Allows Writ Petition for Discharge Certificate under Sabka Vishwas Scheme — Procedural Requirements Not to Prejudice Compliant Declarants. The court found that procedural compliance should not impede the issuance of a discharge certificate when substantial conditions are met.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Writ Petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by M/S India Japan Lighting Private Ltd, challenging the rejection of their request for a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019. The petitioner sought to quash two impugned letters dated 06.09.2023 and 08.11.2023, and an Order-in-Original dated 21.11.2023. The respondents rejected the request on the grounds that the scheme had closed and the case did not meet the conditions for manual processing. The petitioner had initially received a show cause notice in 2005 regarding CENVAT Credit recovery, and later availed the benefits of the scheme by filing a declaration and making payments within the stipulated time. The petitioner withdrew their appeal in compliance with the scheme's requirements, but the request for a discharge certificate was denied. The court analyzed the provisions of the Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, and noted that while the scheme mandated certain conditions, the procedural requirement of notifying the withdrawal of the appeal should not bar the petitioner from receiving the discharge certificate. The court emphasized that the petitioner had complied with the essential conditions and that procedural infractions should not prejudice the petitioner. Ultimately, the court set aside the impugned orders and directed the respondents to process the request for the discharge certificate manually, allowing the writ petition.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Discharge Certificate Issuance - Compliance with Procedural Requirements - Finance (No.2) Act, 2019, Section 127 - The court held that procedural requirements should not impede the issuance of a discharge certificate when the petitioner has complied with substantial conditions of the scheme. The respondents were directed to process the request for SVLDRS-4 manually and issue the discharge certificate within four weeks (Paras 26-27).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to a discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme despite procedural infractions.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court set aside the impugned orders and directed the respondents to process the request for SVLDRS-4 manually and issue the discharge certificate within four weeks. The proceedings dated 21.11.2023 were also set aside.

Law Points

  • Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus
  • Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme
  • 2019
  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • discharge certificate issuance
  • procedural compliance
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 294

WP No. 608 of 2024

2026-09-15

S. Raveekumar

Mr. Balaji Sai Krishnan, Ms. Samriddhi S, Mr. A.P. Srinivas

M/S India Japan Lighting Private Ltd

The Designated Committee, Assistant Commissioner of GST & Central Excise

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to the rejection of discharge certificate request under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the rejection letters and obtain a discharge certificate.

Filing Reason

Rejection of request for discharge certificate under the Sabka Vishwas Scheme.

Previous Decisions

The petitioner had previously filed a declaration under the scheme and made payments within the stipulated time.

Issues

Whether the rejection of the discharge certificate request was valid despite compliance with the scheme's conditions. Whether procedural infractions can bar the issuance of a discharge certificate.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that they complied with all substantial conditions of the scheme and that procedural requirements should not impede relief. Respondents contended that the request for discharge certificate could not be processed as the scheme was closed and the withdrawal was not timely.

Ratio Decidendi

Procedural compliance should not bar the issuance of a discharge certificate when the petitioner has satisfied the essential conditions of the scheme.

Judgment Excerpts

The request for withdrawal was made during the first wave of the pandemic, which is well within the period when the Scheme was in force. The legal maxim actus curiae neminem gravabit is squarely applicable in the circumstances of the present case. The court held that procedural requirements should not impede the issuance of a discharge certificate when the petitioner has complied with substantial conditions of the scheme.

Procedural History

The Writ Petition was filed challenging the rejection of discharge certificate requests, with subsequent amendments and hearings leading to the final decision.

Acts & Sections

  • Finance (No.2) Act, 2019: Section 127
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Haryana's Notification on Creamy Layer Criteria in Backward Classes Reservation Due to Violation of Constitutional Principles. The identification of creamy layer must consider social and economic factors, not solely economic cri...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Against Family Court Order Directing Payment of Rent for Wife's Alternate Accommodation in Divorce Proceedings. Family Court's Order Set Aside for Failure to Consider Financial Needs and Resources of Partie...