High Court Dismisses Writ Petition as Infructuous — Selection Process Completed. The court found that the selection process had concluded, rendering the petition moot under Article 226 of the Constitution.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed by the petitioner seeking a Writ of Mandamus under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, directing the respondents to consider the petitioner's registration for the recruitment process of Tamil Nadu ration shops for the posts of 'Packers' and 'Salesman'. The petitioner requested that the interview and selection process be conducted on merits, and that a merit list be published to ensure equal opportunity in the interview. The learned counsel for the petitioner presented the case, while the learned Government Advocate for the respondents indicated that the selection process had already been completed. This fact was not seriously disputed by the petitioner’s counsel. Given the completion of the selection process, the court found that there was no remaining issue to adjudicate, leading to the dismissal of the writ petition as infructuous. The court ordered no costs associated with the dismissal.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Dismissal of Writ Petition - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - The petitioner sought a direction for consideration in the recruitment process for the post of 'Packers' and 'Salesman' but the selection process had already concluded. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous since the factual position was not disputed by the petitioner’s counsel, thereby rendering the request moot. Held that no further action was warranted (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the writ petition for consideration in the recruitment process should be allowed despite the completion of the selection process.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court dismissed the writ petition as infructuous, noting that the selection process had already concluded and no further action was warranted.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Article 226
  • Recruitment Process
  • Infructuous Petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (MAD) (09) 77

WP No. 36548 of 2024

2026-09-03

C.Kumarappan

2026:MHC:3694

Ms.K. Indumathy Venkatesh, Mr.V.SIVALINGAM

R.Naresh Kumar

The Secretary, Civil Supplies Department, Government Of Tamilnadu, The Registrar Co-operative Societies, Joint Registrar Of Co-operative Societies

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition for mandamus regarding recruitment process

Remedy Sought

Direction for consideration in recruitment and publication of merit list

Filing Reason

Petitioner sought equal opportunity in the selection process

Issues

Whether the writ petition should be allowed despite the completion of the selection process

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought consideration in recruitment process Respondents stated that the selection process was completed

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that once the selection process was completed, the petitioner's request for consideration became moot, thus justifying the dismissal of the writ petition.

Judgment Excerpts

This writ petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the petitioner’s Registration No.32117999 The learned Government Advocate would submit that the selection process has already been over Hence, recording the submission of the learned Government Advocate, the present writ petition is dismissed as infructuous.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed, heard by the court, and subsequently dismissed.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Inclusion of Special Allowances in Basic Wages for Provident Fund. The court considered whether special allowances paid by establishments to employees fall within 'basic wages' under Section 2(b)(ii) read with Section 6...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Appellant's Title in Land Dispute — Adverse Possession by Non-Tribal Not Recognized. The court ruled that a non-tribal cannot acquire title by adverse possession over property belonging to a tribal, as such acquisition is proh...