Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order for Archaeological Survey in Religious Dispute — Non-invasive Methods Mandated. The court affirmed the High Court's directive for a scientific survey under Order XXVI Rule 10A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, ensuring no damage to the mosque structure.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India addressed a Special Leave Petition challenging a High Court order regarding an archaeological survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque area. The petitioners, the Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masajid, sought to contest the High Court's dismissal of their appeal against a District Judge's directive for a survey to ascertain the nature and age of the structure. The respondents, led by Rakhi Singh, filed a suit claiming the right to perform rituals at the mosque, which they alleged was built over a pre-existing Hindu temple. The District Judge had allowed the appointment of an Advocate Commissioner for the survey, which was subsequently affirmed by the High Court. The Supreme Court noted that the survey would be conducted without any excavation or damage to the mosque, as clarified by the Archaeological Survey of India (ASI). The court emphasized the importance of non-invasive methods and directed that the ASI's report be submitted to the trial court for further proceedings. The petition was ultimately disposed of, with the court reiterating the High Court's safeguards regarding the survey process.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Archaeological Survey - Non-invasive Methodology - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order XXVI Rule 10A - The court upheld the High Court's order directing an archaeological survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque area, emphasizing that the survey must be conducted using non-invasive methods to prevent damage to the structure. The court reiterated that no excavation or destruction of the property would occur during the survey process, ensuring compliance with the legal provisions and safeguarding the site's integrity (Paras 9-17).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the High Court's order for an archaeological survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque area was justified under the provisions of the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 and the Civil Procedure Code, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's order for an archaeological survey, mandating that it be conducted using non-invasive methods to ensure no damage to the mosque structure. The court directed that the ASI's report be submitted to the trial court for further proceedings.

Law Points

  • Article 136
  • Order XXVI Rule 10A
  • Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act
  • 1991
  • Civil Procedure Code
  • 1908
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (08) 183

Special Leave Petition (Civil) No. 31345 of 2023

2023-08-04

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J B Pardiwala, Manoj Misra

Huzefa A Ahmadi, Madhavi Divan, Tushar Mehta

Committee of Management Anjuman Intezamia Masajid

Rakhi Singh and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to an order for an archaeological survey in a religious dispute.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to quash the High Court's order allowing the survey.

Filing Reason

The respondents claimed entitlement to perform rituals at the mosque.

Previous Decisions

The High Court affirmed the District Judge's order for the survey.

Issues

Whether the survey order contravenes the Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991. Whether the survey can be conducted without causing damage to the mosque.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the survey violates the Places of Worship Act and previous stay orders. Respondents contended that the survey is necessary for the court's understanding and does not harm the structure.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the necessity of conducting scientific investigations under Order XXVI Rule 10A while ensuring that no excavation or damage occurs to the existing structure, aligning with the provisions of the Places of Worship Act.

Judgment Excerpts

The court upheld the High Court's order directing an archaeological survey of the Gyanvapi Mosque area, emphasizing that the survey must be conducted using non-invasive methods to prevent damage to the structure. The High Court clarified that while it was affirming the order dated 21 July 2023 of the District Judge, this was subject to the observations of the High Court and the contents of the affidavit which was filed on behalf of ASI.

Procedural History

The petitioner challenged the High Court's dismissal of their appeal against the District Judge's order for an archaeological survey, which was affirmed by the High Court. The Supreme Court reviewed the case under Article 136 and issued directions for the survey process.

Acts & Sections

  • Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act:
  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XXVI Rule 10A
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Land Possession Dispute, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Ownership and Possession in Favor of Paschim Gujarat Vij Company Ltd. The Court Held That the Defendant Failed to Prove Adverse Possession and Tha...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Transfer Order — Upholds Service Regulations. The court found that the guidelines for spousal postings do not confer an absolute right to transfer if not feasible under administrative needs.