Supreme Court Allows Bank's Appeal Against Transfer Order — Upholds Service Regulations. The court found that the guidelines for spousal postings do not confer an absolute right to transfer if not feasible under administrative needs.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose between a bank officer and the Bank of India regarding a transfer request based on the officer's wife's employment. The officer, Jagjit Singh Mehta, was promoted to Junior Management Grade Scale-1 and posted in Bihar, having previously worked in Chandigarh. He filed a writ petition seeking transfer back to Chandigarh, citing his wife's employment there. The High Court granted his request, leading to the Bank's appeal. The Supreme Court analyzed the relevant regulations and guidelines, concluding that while the guidelines encouraged posting spouses together, they did not create an enforceable right to such a transfer. The court emphasized that the officer had voluntarily accepted the terms of service, including the possibility of transfer anywhere in India. The court found that the High Court had erred in granting the transfer without considering the administrative needs and the officer's prior undertaking. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the Bank's appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the writ petition, reinforcing the principle that career choices involve trade-offs between personal and professional obligations.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer Policy - Claim for Transfer Based on Spouse's Employment - Bank of India (Officers’) Service Regulations, 1979, Regulation 47 - The court held that while guidelines exist for posting spouses together, they do not confer a right to such posting if not feasible according to administrative needs. The officer's prior undertaking for transfer anywhere in India was binding, and the High Court's order was set aside. (Paras 495-496).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a bank officer can claim transfer to a specific location based on the employment of a spouse.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the Bank's appeal, set aside the High Court's order, and dismissed the writ petition, emphasizing the binding nature of the officer's undertaking for transfer anywhere in India.

Law Points

  • Service Law
  • Transfer Policy
  • Spousal Employment Guidelines
  • Administrative Needs
  • Legal Rights
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

1991 LawText (SC) (11) 22

Civil Appeal No. 4541 of 1991

1991-11-22

Verma, Jagdish Saran, Sharma, L.M., Agrawal, S.C.

1992 AIR 519, 1991 SCR Supl. (2) 492, 1992 SCC (1) 306, JT 1991 (4) 460, 1991 SCALE (2) 1108

Dr. Anand Prakash, Mrs. Veena Birbal, Raj Birbal, D.R. Sehgal, S.K. Bagga, Mrs. S.K. Bagga

Bank of India

Jagjit Singh Mehta

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding transfer of a bank officer based on spouse's employment.

Remedy Sought

Transfer from Bihar to Chandigarh.

Filing Reason

Claim based on wife's employment at Chandigarh.

Previous Decisions

High Court allowed the transfer, which was contested by the Bank.

Issues

Claim for transfer based on spouse's employment Feasibility of transfer under administrative needs

Submissions/Arguments

The respondent argued for transfer based on spousal guidelines. The appellant contended that the transfer was not feasible under service regulations.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that guidelines for spousal postings do not create an enforceable right to transfer if not feasible according to administrative needs, and that acceptance of service terms includes the possibility of transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

The only thing required is that the departmental authorities should consider the feasibility of a suitable posting along with the exigencies of administration. The High Court was in error in overlooking all the relevant aspects as well as the absence of any legal right in the respondent to claim the relief.

Procedural History

The respondent filed a writ petition in the High Court, which was allowed. The Bank appealed to the Supreme Court against this order.

Acts & Sections

  • Banking Companies (Acquisition and Transfer of Undertakings) Act, 1970:
  • Bank of India (Officers’) Service Regulations, 1979: Regulation 47
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Government Servant Against Removal Order Under Article 311(2) of Constitution of India, 1950. Show Cause Notice Proposing All Three Major Penalties in the Alternative Held Valid as It Afforded Better Opportunity to S...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Sales Tax Exemption Case — Clarifies Definition of Rayon Tyre Cord Fabric. The court determined that 'Rayon Tyre Cord Fabric' is a textile fabric and exempt from sales tax under the Rajasthan Sales Tax Act, 1954.