Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Allotment Dispute — Quashes Cancellation of Allotment. The court found that the appellant had made substantial payments and was willing to pay additional compensation, thus ruling the cancellation unjustified.

  • 8
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the cancellation of a residential plot allotment to the appellant, Anjana Saraiya, by the State of U.P. due to alleged non-payment of instalments. The appellant was allotted Plot No.415 in Ghaziabad under the Middle Income Group scheme after a successful draw of lots, with a total price of Rs.2,70,000. She made an upfront payment of Rs.94,500 and paid the first three instalments but defaulted on the next four due to her husband's ill health, leading to financial difficulties. A notice was served on her regarding the cancellation of the allotment, but she managed to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.1,39,000, including interest, before the notice was received. The High Court dismissed her writ petition, stating she did not fulfill the payment terms. The appellant argued that her defaults were not willful and offered to pay additional compensation for the delay. The State supported the High Court's decision, asserting that the cancellation was justified due to the appellant's failure to pay on time. The Supreme Court, however, found that the appellant had made significant payments and was willing to pay further compensation. The court ruled that the cancellation was unjustified and allowed the appeal, quashing the cancellation order and directing the respondents to hand over possession of the plot upon payment of Rs.2,00,000 within six weeks.

Headnote

A) Property Law - Allotment Cancellation - Justification for Cancellation - Not applicable, 2006 - The appellant's allotment was cancelled due to non-payment of instalments, but the court found that the appellant had made substantial payments and was willing to pay additional compensation. Held that the cancellation was not justified and allowed the appeal (Paras 5-6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cancellation of the allotment of the residential plot was justified due to non-payment of instalments.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, quashed the cancellation of the allotment, and directed the respondents to hand over possession of the plot upon payment of Rs.2,00,000 within six weeks.

Law Points

  • Property allotment
  • default in payment
  • compensation for delayed payment
  • cancellation of allotment
  • High Court jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (05) 239

Civil Appeal No. 3784 of 2022

2022-05-12

M. R. Shah, B.V. Nagarathna

Kavin Gulati, V.K. Shukla, Dinesh Kumar Garg

Anjana Saraiya

The State of U.P. & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding cancellation of property allotment due to non-payment of instalments.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to quash the cancellation of the allotment and to complete registration proceedings.

Filing Reason

The appellant filed a writ petition after her allotment was cancelled due to alleged non-payment.

Previous Decisions

The High Court dismissed the writ petition, stating the appellant did not fulfill payment terms.

Issues

Justification for cancellation of allotment Implications of delayed payment on allotment rights

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that her defaults were due to financial difficulties caused by her husband's ill health and that she was willing to pay additional compensation. The State contended that the appellant failed to make timely payments as required under the scheme.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the appellant's substantial payments and willingness to pay additional compensation indicated no willful default, thus justifying the reversal of the cancellation.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant deposited the entire amount and cleared all the instalments along with the interest. The court found that the cancellation was not justified and allowed the appeal.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a writ petition in the High Court after receiving a notice of cancellation, which was dismissed, leading to the present appeal.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Bank Officers Due to Malicious Intent. Complaint Filed as Counterblast to FIR by Bank, Lacking Concrete Allegations of Offence.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Gift Dispute — Father's Power to Gift Ancestral Property Upheld. Compromise Decree Based on Gift Not Challenged, First Appellate Court Erred in Considering Irrelevant Factors.