Supreme Court Dismisses Special Leave Petitions for Withdrawal with Costs. Court allowed withdrawal of petitions subject to costs to prevent financial burden on public sector lenders.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from Special Leave Petitions filed by Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited and another against the Reserve Bank of India, challenging three circulars issued by the RBI. The petitions were linked to financial arrangements made with lenders, where eleven out of twelve lenders assigned their debts to Assets Care & Reconstruction Enterprise Ltd. (ACRE). Following these arrangements, ACRE agreed to withdraw insolvency proceedings against the petitioners, who sought to withdraw their Special Leave Petitions. The RBI opposed this withdrawal, arguing that the petitioners had acted behind its back and should not be allowed to withdraw. The court acknowledged the RBI's concerns but ultimately allowed the withdrawal, emphasizing the potential financial implications for public sector lenders if the petitions were not dismissed. The court ordered the petitioners to deposit a sum of Rs.10,00,000 as costs with the Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society within two weeks. The Transfer Petition related to the matter was rejected as no further orders were necessary following the dismissal of the Special Leave Petitions. The court clarified that it did not endorse any actions taken after the status-quo order was issued.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Withdrawal of Special Leave Petitions - Conditions for Withdrawal - Supreme Court of India, 2022 - Court allowed withdrawal of Special Leave Petitions subject to deposit of costs, despite RBI's opposition, to avoid financial repercussions for public sector lenders. The court noted the potential financial burden on lenders if the petitions were rejected and status-quo restored, thus permitting withdrawal with conditions (Paras 7-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioners could withdraw the Special Leave Petitions despite opposition from the Reserve Bank of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court allowed the withdrawal of the Special Leave Petitions subject to the petitioners depositing Rs.10,00,000 as costs with the Supreme Court Middle Income Group Legal Aid Society within two weeks, and dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Withdrawal of petitions
  • Insolvency proceedings
  • Status-quo orders
  • Financial creditor arrangements
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (05) 201

Special Leave Petition (Civil) Nos.9286-9287 of 2018, Transfer Petition (Civil) No.1971 of 2018

2022-05-04

Uday Umesh Lalit, S. Ravindra Bhat

Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited

Reserve Bank of India

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Challenge to circulars issued by the Reserve Bank of India.

Remedy Sought

Withdrawal of Special Leave Petitions.

Filing Reason

Challenging three circulars issued by the RBI.

Previous Decisions

High Court of Judicature at Bombay issued a judgment on 05.03.2018.

Issues

Whether the petitioners could withdraw the Special Leave Petitions despite RBI's opposition.

Submissions/Arguments

RBI opposed the withdrawal, citing arrangements made behind its back. Petitioners argued for withdrawal to avoid financial repercussions for lenders.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need to prevent financial repercussions for public sector lenders when allowing withdrawal of petitions, balancing the interests of the parties involved.

Judgment Excerpts

We allow the applications seeking permission to withdraw the Special Leave Petitions. We make it clear that we have neither affirmed nor given any seal of imprimatur insofar as the events which have happened after the order of status-quo.

Procedural History

The Special Leave Petitions were filed against a High Court judgment, and the court issued notice and maintained status-quo before allowing withdrawal with conditions.

Acts & Sections

  • Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Mother in Infant Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for drowning of 2-month-old daughter set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasona...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging No Objection Certificate for Society Redevelopment. Circular dated 3rd January 2009 under Section 79A of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 held not mandatory but directory.