Supreme Court Revokes Wildlife Clearance for Railway Line Project Due to Environmental Concerns. The approval granted by the NBWL was found to violate the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, and lacked adequate environmental assessment.

  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed the environmental implications of a proposed railway line doubling project from Castlerock in Karnataka to Kulem in Goa, which traversed ecologically sensitive areas. The Goa Foundation raised concerns regarding the project's compliance with prior court orders and its potential to harm wildlife habitats. The Central Empowered Committee (CEC) submitted a report recommending the revocation of the approval granted by the National Board for Wildlife (NBWL), citing violations of guidelines under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. The CEC highlighted the ecological significance of the Western Ghats and the detrimental effects of the project on wildlife corridors. The court noted that the project would not enhance operational efficiency and would instead exacerbate environmental degradation. Arguments from the project proponent, Rail Vikas Nigam Limited (RVNL), emphasized economic benefits and previous clearances, but the court found these insufficient against the backdrop of environmental protection principles. Ultimately, the court upheld the CEC's recommendation, revoking the NBWL's approval and mandating a comprehensive environmental impact assessment before any further proposals could be considered.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Wildlife Clearance - Revocation of Approval - Wildlife Protection Act, 1972, Section 38(0) - The court upheld the recommendation of the Central Empowered Committee to revoke the approval for the railway line project due to significant environmental concerns and lack of adequate assessment of its impact on wildlife and biodiversity. Held that the project posed a serious threat to the ecological balance of the Western Ghats (Paras 23-24).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the approval granted by the Standing Committee of the National Board for Wildlife for doubling the railway line from Castlerock to Kulem should be revoked due to environmental concerns.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court revoked the approval granted by the NBWL for the doubling of the railway line between Castlerock and Kulem, citing significant environmental concerns and the need for a comprehensive impact assessment before any further proposals could be considered.

Law Points

  • Wildlife Protection
  • Environmental Law
  • Sustainable Development
  • Precautionary Principle
  • Interlocutory Applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (05) 179

I.A. No. 61370 of 2021

2022-05-09

L. Nageswara Rao, B. R. Gavai, Aniruddha Bose

A.D.N. Rao, Prasant Bhushan, Sanjay Upadhyay, Balbir Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Environmental litigation concerning wildlife clearance for a railway project.

Remedy Sought

Goa Foundation sought revocation of wildlife clearance granted for the railway project.

Filing Reason

Concerns over environmental degradation and violation of prior court orders.

Previous Decisions

Court had previously directed the NBWL to comply with environmental guidelines.

Issues

Whether the NBWL's approval for the railway line project was justified given environmental concerns. The adequacy of environmental assessments conducted prior to granting the approval.

Submissions/Arguments

Goa Foundation argued that the project would harm wildlife and violate environmental laws. RVNL contended that the project was essential for economic development and had obtained necessary clearances.

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the need for balancing development with environmental protection, asserting that environmental concerns must take precedence over economic interests in cases of doubt.

Judgment Excerpts

The court upheld the recommendation of the Central Empowered Committee to revoke the approval for the railway line project due to significant environmental concerns. The project posed a serious threat to the ecological balance of the Western Ghats.

Procedural History

The court had previously directed the NBWL to furnish orders related to wildlife matters and allowed the CEC to approach the court if unsatisfied with NBWL's decisions.

Acts & Sections

  • Wildlife Protection Act, 1972: Section 38(0)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Sets Aside Bail Grant in Murder Case Due to Seriousness of Crime and Role of Accused. High Court Erroneously Assumed No Overt Act by Second Respondent, Failing to Consider Evidence of Involvement in Conspiracy.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Employees' Right to Bonus Under Payment of Bonus Act, 1965 — Clarifies Applicability Despite Authorised Controller Appointment.