Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeals in Homicide Case — Conviction Modified. The court found the incident lacked premeditation and the accused were not armed, leading to a conviction under Section 304 IPC instead of murder.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case involved three accused-appellants who challenged their conviction in a homicide case. The High Court of Kerala had partly allowed their appeals, setting aside some convictions while confirming others. The prosecution alleged that the appellants, along with others, formed an unlawful assembly and attacked the deceased, Varkeychen @ George Thomas, leading to his death. The incident occurred during a festival when a verbal altercation escalated into physical violence. The deceased and his friends were compelled to alight from their vehicle and were subsequently assaulted. The deceased succumbed to his injuries the following day. The trial court convicted the appellants under various sections of the Indian Penal Code, including murder. The High Court acquitted several co-accused and modified the convictions of the appellants. The Supreme Court analyzed the evidence, focusing on the lack of premeditation and the nature of the assault. It concluded that the appellants did not intend to kill, thus reducing the charge to culpable homicide not amounting to murder. The court maintained the convictions for other charges but ordered their release due to the time already served. The appeals were partly allowed, modifying the High Court's judgment accordingly.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Culpable Homicide vs. Murder - Distinction between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder - Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 302, 304 - The court found that the incident lacked premeditation and was not committed with the intention to kill, thus qualifying as culpable homicide not amounting to murder under Section 304. The appellants were acquitted of murder charges but convicted under Section 304 Part II IPC. (Paras 21-23).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the acts of the accused amounted to culpable homicide amounting to murder or not.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court acquitted the appellants of murder under Section 302 IPC but convicted them under Section 304 Part II IPC, maintaining other convictions. The sentence was set to the period already undergone, leading to their release.

Law Points

  • culpable homicide
  • murder
  • unlawful assembly
  • common object
  • premeditation
  • grievous hurt
  • acquittal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (07) 224

Criminal Appeal No. 1838 of 2019

2022-07-12

Ajay Rastogi, Vikram Nath

Ajmal, Biju, Ashique Salam

State of Kerala

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for homicide.

Remedy Sought

The appellants sought to overturn their conviction.

Filing Reason

Appeal against the High Court's judgment confirming their conviction.

Previous Decisions

The High Court had partly allowed the appeals of the appellants.

Issues

Whether the acts constituted murder or culpable homicide not amounting to murder. Whether the appellants acted with premeditation.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellants argued there was no premeditation and the assault was not intended to kill. The State contended that the assault was premeditated and constituted murder.

Ratio Decidendi

The court distinguished between culpable homicide amounting to murder and not amounting to murder based on the absence of premeditation and the nature of the assault.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellants would be entitled for acquittal under section 302 IPC but would be liable to be convicted under section 304 Part II IPC. The High Court found that there was no unlawful assembly formed with a common object.

Procedural History

The trial court convicted the appellants under various sections of IPC. The High Court partly allowed their appeals, leading to the current appeal in the Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 302, 304, 341, 323, 324, 427, 143, 147, 148, 149
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 173(2), 313
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Election Appeal Against High Court Order Upholding Fatal Defect in Affidavit Copy Under Representation of the People Act, 1951. Non-supply of a true copy of the affidavit lacking Oath Commissioner's affirmation was held mandat...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Recording Witness Statements — Discretion of Magistrate Affirmed.