Supreme Court Allows Appeal Challenging Environmental Clearance Due to Invalid Single Member Bench Composition. Single Member Bench's Order Found Invalid as it Contravened Section 4(4)(c) of the NGT Act, 2010.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeals arose from an order dated 16 July 2021 of the National Green Tribunal (NGT) concerning the environmental clearance granted to Ultratech Cement Limited for limestone mining in Gujarat. The Talli Gram Panchayat, the appellant, challenged this clearance on several grounds, including ecological sensitivity and lack of consent from landholders. The NGT dismissed the appellant's applications for condonation of delay in filing the appeal, asserting that the environmental clearance was duly communicated and uploaded, thus the limitation period should be calculated from that date. The appellant sought to challenge the validity of the single member bench that dismissed their application, arguing it contravened the NGT Act's requirement for equal representation of judicial and expert members. The fourth respondent contended that the NGT had no power to condone delays beyond 90 days and that the appellant had been negligent in pursuing the case. The Supreme Court analyzed whether the single member bench could legally dismiss the applications after an assurance from the Attorney General that the rules would be rectified. The Court found that the single member bench's jurisdiction was improperly assumed, as it did not comply with the statutory requirement for bench composition. Consequently, the Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the NGT's order, and restored the original appeal for fresh disposal, keeping all rights and contentions open without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Environmental Clearance - Validity of Environmental Clearance - National Green Tribunal Act, 2010, Section 4(4)(c) - The single member bench's order was found to contravene the requirement for equal judicial and expert members, leading to the dismissal of the applications being invalid. The Supreme Court held that the assumption of jurisdiction by a single member bench was vitiated due to the non-compliance with statutory provisions (Paras 12-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a single member of the Tribunal could have dealt with the proceedings and dismissed the applications for restoration and for condonation of delay.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeals, set aside the impugned order of the NGT dated 16 July 2021, and restored the original order of the NGT dated 29 January 2018 for fresh disposal, keeping all rights and contentions open.

Law Points

  • Environmental clearance
  • National Green Tribunal
  • single member bench
  • condonation of delay
  • principles of natural justice
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2022 LawText (SC) (07) 144

Civil Appeal Nos 383-384 of 2022

2022-07-11

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, A S Bopanna

Mr Sanjay Parikh, Mr Abhimanue Shrestha, Mr Satwik Parikh, Mr Divyansh Khurana, Mr Shivam Tomar, Ms Aishwarya Bhati, Ms Ruchi Kohli, Ms Swarupama Chaturvedi, Mr Digvijay Dam, Ms Poornima Singh, Mr G.S. Makkar, Dr A.M. Singhvi, Ms Vanita Bhargava, Mr Ajay Bhargava, Ms Shweta Kabra, Ms Prerna Singh

Talli Gram Panchayat

Union of India and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against the dismissal of applications for condonation of delay and recall of an order by the NGT.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought to challenge the environmental clearance granted to Ultratech Cement Limited.

Filing Reason

The appeal was filed beyond the prescribed period of limitation.

Previous Decisions

The NGT dismissed the applications for condonation of delay and recall of the order.

Issues

Whether the single member of the Tribunal could have dealt with the proceedings and dismissed the applications for restoration and for condonation of delay. Whether the NGT had the power to condone a delay beyond 90 days under the NGT Act.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the environmental clearance was not properly communicated and that the single member bench's composition was invalid. The fourth respondent contended that the NGT had no power to condone delays beyond 90 days and that the appellant had been negligent.

Ratio Decidendi

The single member bench's order was invalid as it contravened the requirement for equal representation of judicial and expert members under Section 4(4)(c) of the NGT Act, 2010.

Judgment Excerpts

The assumption of jurisdiction by a single member Bench clearly stands vitiated. The EC was granted on 05.01.2017 while the appeal was filed on 19.4.2017 beyond the prescribed period of limitation.

Procedural History

The appellant filed an appeal against the NGT's order dismissing applications for condonation of delay and recall of an order. The NGT's decision was based on the argument that the environmental clearance was duly communicated and uploaded.

Acts & Sections

  • National Green Tribunal Act, 2010: Section 4(4)(c), Section 16
  • Environment Impact Assessment Notification: Clause 10
  • National Green Tribunal (Practice and Procedure) Rules, 2011: Rule 3
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Plaintiff's Possession Established Through Registered Sale Deed and Revenue Records. First Appellate Court's Reversal Set Aside for Ignoring Evidence of Possession and Failing to ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Restoration of Land to Scheduled Tribe Under Maharashtra Restoration of Lands to Scheduled Tribes Act, 1974. Transfer of Property by Non-Tribal to Another Non-Tribal Does Not Extinguish Right of O...