Supreme Court Dismisses Review Petition in Civil Matter — No Error Apparent on Record. Condonation of delay in filing the Review Petition was granted, but the court found no substance in the matter.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a Review Petition (Civil) No. @ Diary No.25555 of 2021 filed by N. Tahera and another against Seema Begum and another. The court considered the delay in filing the Review Petition and condoned it. However, upon reviewing the material on record, the court found no substance in the Special Leave Petition that had been previously rejected at the admission stage. The court stated that there was no error apparent on record that would justify any interference with the earlier decision. Consequently, the Review Petition was dismissed. The judgment was delivered by Justices Uday Umesh Lalit, Ajay Rastogi, and Aniruddha Bose on November 30, 2021.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Review Petition - Error Apparent on Record - Review Petition (Civil) No. @ Diary No.25555 of 2021 - Court found no error apparent on record to justify interference with the earlier decision rejecting the Special Leave Petition. The Review Petition was dismissed as the court did not find any substance in the matter (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether there was an error apparent on record justifying interference in the Special Leave Petition.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Review Petition was dismissed as the court found no error apparent on record to justify interference.

Law Points

  • Review jurisdiction
  • error apparent on record
  • dismissal of review petition
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (11) 212

Review Petition (Civil) No. @ Diary No.25555 of 2021

2021-11-30

Uday Umesh Lalit, Ajay Rastogi, Aniruddha Bose

N. Tahera & Anr.

Seema Begum & Anr.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review Petition in a civil matter

Remedy Sought

Review of the earlier decision rejecting the Special Leave Petition

Previous Decisions

Special Leave Petition was rejected at the admission stage

Issues

Existence of error apparent on record Substance in the Special Leave Petition

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for review based on perceived errors Respondents contended there was no basis for review

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that a review petition requires an error apparent on record for interference, which was not found in this case.

Judgment Excerpts

Delay in preferring the Review Petition is condoned. This review Petition is dismissed.

Procedural History

The Review Petition was filed after the rejection of the Special Leave Petition at the admission stage.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Conversion Permission Under Section 44 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 — Deemed Permission Granted Due to Delay. Failure to Obtain No-Objection Certificates Not a Valid Ground for Rejection After Expiry of 90-Day Per...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Execution Order in Landlord-Tenant Dispute — Delays in Execution Proceedings Condemned. The executing court's authority is limited to execution matters and cannot revisit prior orders unless jurisdiction is challenged.