Supreme Court Corrects Typographical Errors in Previous Judgment. The court amended monetary figures and counsel appearances to ensure accuracy in the judgment.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court of India dealt with a Miscellaneous Application filed by M/s Magadh Sugar and Energy Ltd for the correction of typographical errors in a judgment dated 24 September 2021. The application sought to amend the amounts mentioned in the judgment, specifically correcting Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores to Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs, respectively, and changing Rs 67 crores in another paragraph to Rs 67 lakhs. Additionally, the appearances of counsel were to be corrected to accurately reflect their designations. The court, upon hearing the counsel, found the corrections necessary for clarity and accuracy in the judgment. The application was disposed of in terms of the signed order, ensuring that the judgment accurately represented the intended figures and counsel appearances. The decision was made on 20 October 2021.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Correction of Judgment - Typographical Errors - Supreme Court of India, 2021 - The court addressed typographical errors in its previous judgment, correcting monetary amounts and appearances of counsel. The corrections were necessary to reflect the accurate figures and representation in the judgment. Held that the application for correction was disposed of accordingly (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the typographical errors in the judgment dated 24 September 2021 should be corrected.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court disposed of the Miscellaneous Application, correcting the typographical errors as requested.

Law Points

  • Correction of typographical errors
  • Judicial orders
  • Miscellaneous applications
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 216

Miscellaneous Application No 1608 of 2021 in Civil Appeal No 5728 of 2021

2021-10-20

Dr D.Y. Chandrachud, B.V. Nagarathna

Mr. Praveen Kumar, Ms. Sunaina Kumar, Mr. Saket Singh, Mrs. Niranjana Singh

M/s Magadh Sugar and Energy Ltd

The State of Bihar & Ors

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Correction of typographical errors in a judgment

Remedy Sought

Correction of amounts and counsel appearances

Filing Reason

To rectify inaccuracies in the previous judgment

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 24 September 2021

Issues

Correction of typographical errors in judgment

Submissions/Arguments

Counsel for the petitioner argued for necessary corrections Counsel for the respondents did not oppose the corrections

Ratio Decidendi

The court emphasized the importance of accuracy in judicial orders and the necessity of correcting typographical errors to reflect the true intent of the judgment.

Judgment Excerpts

The amount of Rs 56 crores and Rs 67 crores mentioned in paragraph 8 of the judgment shall be corrected to read as Rs 5.6 crores and Rs 67 lakhs respectively. The Miscellaneous Application is accordingly disposed of.

Procedural History

The Miscellaneous Application was filed for correction of typographical errors in the judgment dated 24 September 2021 and was heard on 20 October 2021.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Denial of Promotion and Seniority in MIDC — Petitioner Granted Deemed Date of Promotion with Consequential Benefits. Court Holds That Sealed Cover Procedure Cannot Be Applied When No Punishment Is ...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Remands Certificate Grant Matter to High Court for Fresh Consideration in Service Posting Dispute. Certificate Under Article 133(1) of Constitution Held Not Properly Granted as High Court Failed to Consider Articles 132(1) and 133(1)(b)...