Supreme Court Directs State to Ensure Appointment of Special Teachers for Children with Special Needs. The State is mandated to comply with the obligations under the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 regarding the appointment of special teachers and provision of education for children with disabilities.

  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitions were filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India by teachers with B.Ed. (Special) and D.Ed. (Special) degrees, representing the interests of children with special needs (CwSN). The petitioners contended that the State was illegally employing them on a contractual basis without job security, despite the need for regular appointments to meet the required teacher-pupil ratio of 1:5 for CwSN. They sought various writs to ensure free and compulsory education for CwSN and the appointment of special teachers in schools. The court issued notices to the respondents and directed the State to conduct a survey regarding CwSN. Over several hearings, the court noted the State's commitment to recruit special education teachers and establish special schools. The court highlighted the importance of inclusive education and the need for special schools for children with disabilities, referencing the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016. The court mandated the State to file affidavits detailing the number of disabled children and the measures taken to comply with the law. The court appointed a committee to assess the situation in schools and directed the State to address deficiencies in special schools. The court emphasized the obligation of the State to ensure quality education for CwSN and the appointment of qualified special teachers, ultimately directing the State to provide timelines for compliance with these obligations.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Right to Education - Obligation to Appoint Special Teachers - Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016, Section 16 - The State is mandated to ensure the appointment of qualified special teachers to meet the educational needs of children with disabilities, maintaining the prescribed teacher-pupil ratio. The court emphasized the necessity of special schools and trained teachers for effective education of children with special needs. Held that the State must comply with its obligations under the law (Paras 6-12).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the State is obligated to appoint special teachers for children with special needs in accordance with the prescribed teacher-pupil ratio.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The court directed the State to ensure the appointment of qualified special teachers for CwSN, maintain the prescribed teacher-pupil ratio, and comply with the provisions of the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016.

Law Points

  • Right to Education
  • Special Education
  • Teacher-Pupil Ratio
  • Rehabilitation Council of India Act
  • 1992
  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act
  • 2016
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (10) 158

Civil Original Jurisdiction Writ Petition (Civil) No. 132 of 2016

2019-04-03

A.M. Khanwilkar

Rajneesh Kumar Pandey & Ors.

Union of India & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Petitions filed for the appointment of special teachers for children with special needs.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought writs for the appointment of special teachers and ensuring education for CwSN.

Filing Reason

Allegation of illegal employment on a contractual basis without job security.

Issues

Obligation of the State to appoint special teachers Compliance with the teacher-pupil ratio for CwSN

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for regular appointments of special teachers State submitted steps taken for recruitment and establishment of special schools

Ratio Decidendi

The State has a statutory obligation to provide quality education to children with disabilities, which includes appointing qualified special teachers and ensuring compliance with the prescribed teacher-pupil ratio.

Judgment Excerpts

The thrust of the grievance in the writ petition(s) is about the illegality being committed by the concerned State and its Authorities in employing them in recognised schools on contract basis without any certainty of tenure. Access to education has already been regarded as a Fundamental Right as per Article 21A of the Constitution.

Procedural History

The court issued notices to the respondents, directed the State to conduct surveys, and mandated the filing of affidavits regarding the appointment of special teachers and the establishment of special schools.

Acts & Sections

  • Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act: 16
  • Rehabilitation Council of India Act: 2, 11, 12, 13
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal on Classification of Textile Fabrics Under Central Excise Tariff Act Due to Lack of Permanent Stiffness. Classification Under Heading 52.06 Affirmed as Fabrics Did Not Meet Criteria for Heading 59.01.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Petitioners in Income Tax Reopening Challenge Due to Change of Opinion. Reassessment Proceedings Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Fail as No Tangible Material Showed Income Escapement Beyond Assessee's Explanation f...