Case Note & Summary
The appellant challenged the common order of the High Court of Karnataka which set aside the conviction of the respondent for dishonouring a cheque. The appellant had agreed to purchase a house from the respondent for Rs. 4,00,000, paying an advance of Rs. 3,50,000. When the cheque for Rs. 1,50,000 was dishonoured, the appellant filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The trial court convicted the respondent, but the High Court later reversed this decision, prompting the appellant's appeal to the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court examined the evidence, noting that the respondent did not dispute the signature on the cheque or the agreement. It emphasized the presumption of consideration under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, which the respondent failed to rebut. The court found that the High Court had erred in its assessment and restored the conviction, modifying the sentence to a fine of Rs. 2,50,000, with a provision for imprisonment in case of default. The court recognized the long duration since the transaction and the need for a balanced approach to sentencing, ultimately allowing the appeal in part.
Headnote
A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Presumption of Consideration - Sections 138, 139 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 - The court held that the signature on the cheque being admitted raised a presumption that it was issued for the discharge of a debt. The respondent failed to provide sufficient evidence to rebut this presumption, leading to the restoration of the conviction (Paras 20-21).
Issue of Consideration
Whether the presumption under Sections 118 and 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act was successfully rebutted by the respondent.
Final Decision
The Supreme Court restored the conviction of the respondent for dishonouring the cheque, modifying the sentence to a fine of Rs. 2,50,000, with six months imprisonment in default of payment. The court directed that Rs. 2,40,000 from the fine be paid to the appellant as compensation.
Law Points
- Negotiable Instruments Act
- 1881
- Section 138
- Criminal Procedure Code
- 1973
- Section 200
- presumption of consideration
- burden of proof
- rebuttal of presumption


