Supreme Court Allows Writ Petitions for Conditional Affiliation of Pharmacy Colleges. The court directed the University to grant affiliation and allow students to participate in special examinations as per the State Government's notification.

In Favour of Prosecution
  • 0
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court addressed two writ petitions filed by Sri Sai RR Institute of Pharmacy and Shri Badrinath College of Pharmacy against Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University. The petitions sought directions for the University to comply with a State Government notification dated 19.3.2021, granting conditional affiliation for the Academic Year 2020-2021 and to organize special examinations for B. Pharma students. The petitioners contended that their cases were similar to a previously allowed writ petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021, which had been decided in favor of the petitioners. The University did not dispute the similarity of facts but argued that Shri Badrinath College of Pharmacy did not participate in the counseling process and that a similar writ petition was pending in the High Court. The court noted that the University had denied affiliation based on the lapse of timelines set by the All India Council for Technical Education (AICTE). However, it acknowledged that the State Government had granted conditional affiliation after considering the recommendations of the Affiliation Committee. The court referred to its earlier decision in Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021, where it had held that the Pharmacy Act, 1948, and the norms set by the Pharmacy Council of India (PCI) must be followed. The court found that the facts of the current petitions were almost identical to those in the earlier case and thus decided to allow the petitions, directing the University to grant affiliation and permit students to participate in special examinations.

Headnote

A) Education Law - Conditional Affiliation - Entitlement to Affiliation - Pharmacy Act, 1948, Section Not mentioned - The court found that the petitioner colleges were entitled to conditional affiliation as the State Government had granted it through a notification after considering the recommendations of the Affiliation Committee. The court directed the University to grant affiliation and allow students to participate in special examinations (Paras 10-11).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner colleges are entitled to conditional affiliation and special examinations for the Academic Year 2020-2021.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the writ petitions, directing the University to grant affiliation to the petitioner colleges for the Academic Year 2020-2021 and to permit students to participate in special examinations as per the State Government's notification dated 19.3.2021.

Law Points

  • Conditional affiliation
  • Academic year compliance
  • Special examinations
  • Pharmacy Act
  • 1948
  • Approval by Pharmacy Council of India
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2021 LawText (SC) (07) 84

Writ Petition (C) No. 446 of 2021 and Writ Petition (C) No. 448 of 2021

2021-07-06

B.R. Gavai, R.F. Nariman, K.M. Joseph

Sri Sai RR Institute of Pharmacy, Shri Badrinath College of Pharmacy

Dr. A.P.J. Abdul Kalam Technical University

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions seeking directions for affiliation and examination participation.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner colleges sought affiliation and permission for students to appear in examinations.

Filing Reason

University's refusal to grant affiliation and allow students to appear for examinations.

Previous Decisions

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 390 of 2021 was allowed by the court.

Issues

Entitlement to conditional affiliation Eligibility for special examinations

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued for entitlement based on previous case University contended non-participation in counseling process

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the Pharmacy Act, 1948, and the norms set by the Pharmacy Council of India must be adhered to, and the petitioners were entitled to the same relief as granted in a similar case.

Judgment Excerpts

The University is therefore directed to grant affiliation to the petitioner Colleges for the Academic Year 202021. The writ petitions are allowed in the above terms.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed after the University denied affiliation and permission for examinations, following a similar case that had been decided in favor of other petitioners.

Acts & Sections

  • Pharmacy Act, 1948:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — No Ground for Interference Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act. Court upholds award of damages for short supply of coal, finding no patent illegality or confli...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Central Industrial Security Force Resignation and Re-enlistment Matter — Deputy Inspector-General Was Competent Authority to Accept Resignation. Rule 11 of CISF Rules, 1969 and proviso to Section 5 of CISF Ac...