Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Mediclaim Policy Dispute — Limits Liability to 50% of Sum Insured. The court determined that the Insurance Company could not repudiate the claim based on pre-existing disease as there was none at the time of initial policy issuance.

In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from a claim made by the appellant under a Family Mediclaim Policy for his son, Master Jasnoor Singh, who underwent significant medical treatment in 2014. The appellant had taken individual Mediclaim Policies for his family members since 2007, and in 2014, he opted for a Family Mediclaim Policy with a sum insured of Rs.5,00,000. After Master Jasnoor Singh's treatment, which incurred medical bills exceeding Rs.8,00,000, the Insurance Company initially repudiated the claim but later paid a partial amount of Rs.27,550. The appellant sought the full sum insured of Rs.5,00,000 from the District Forum, which awarded him Rs.26,200 plus compensation for harassment. The State Commission later directed the Insurance Company to pay the entire sum insured minus the amount already paid. The Insurance Company challenged this decision before the National Commission, which upheld the District Forum's order, leading to the current appeal. The Supreme Court found that the Insurance Company could not deny liability based on a pre-existing disease since none existed at the time of the initial policy. The court clarified that the maximum claim amount was limited to 50% of the sum insured, amounting to Rs.2,50,000. The appeal was allowed, and the Insurance Company was directed to pay the appellant the remaining amount along with compensation for mental agony and litigation costs, plus interest on the balance amount.

Headnote

A) Insurance Law - Liability under Mediclaim Policy - Extent of Liability - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - The court determined that the Insurance Company could not repudiate the claim based on pre-existing disease as there was none at the time of initial policy issuance. The court held that the maximum payable amount under the Family Mediclaim Policy was limited to 50% of the sum insured, which was Rs.2,50,000 for the treatment of Master Jasnoor Singh (Paras 10-14).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Extent of liability of the Insurance Company under the Family Mediclaim Policy

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal, directing the Insurance Company to pay Rs.2,50,000 minus the amount already paid, along with Rs.50,000 for mental agony and Rs.30,000 for litigation costs, plus interest at 7.5% p.a. from the date of the complaint.

Law Points

  • Insurance liability
  • Mediclaim Policy
  • pre-existing disease
  • claim repudiation
  • compensation for mental agony
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (SC) (08) 262

Civil Appeal No. 6255 of 2019

2019-08-14

Vineet Saran, Uday Umesh Lalit

Kanwaljit Singh

National Insurance Company Ltd

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Dispute regarding the liability of the Insurance Company under a Family Mediclaim Policy.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought the full sum insured of Rs.5,00,000 under the Family Mediclaim Policy.

Filing Reason

Claim for medical expenses incurred for treatment of Master Jasnoor Singh.

Previous Decisions

The District Forum awarded Rs.26,200 plus compensation, which was later increased by the State Commission.

Issues

Extent of liability under the Family Mediclaim Policy Validity of claim repudiation based on pre-existing disease

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued for full payment based on continuous policy renewal without pre-existing disease. Insurance Company justified the claim reduction based on pre-existing disease from a prior policy.

Ratio Decidendi

The Insurance Company could not repudiate the claim based on pre-existing disease as none existed at the time of the initial policy issuance. The maximum claim amount was limited to 50% of the sum insured under the Family Mediclaim Policy.

Judgment Excerpts

The question involved in this appeal is with regard to the extent of the liability of the Insurance Company. The total amount of medical bill thus came to Rs.8,55,226/ - . The maximum claim which could be payable in the present case would be 50% of the sum insured under the Family Mediclaim Policy.

Procedural History

The appellant filed a complaint before the District Forum, which awarded partial relief. The State Commission allowed the appeal in toto, leading to a revision petition by the Insurance Company before the National Commission, which upheld the District Forum's order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Detention Challenge Under National Security Act Due to Delay in Representation Consideration. Unreasonable Delay in Considering Representations Violates Constitutional Rights Under Article 22(5).
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appellant in Tender Dispute Over Earnest Money Payment. Tender Condition Waiver Permitted as Technical Irregularity Found Insignificant.