High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur Reviewed Multiple Civil Writ Petitions Filed by Religious and Educational Institutions Against State Authorities. No Specific Statutory Provision or Final Outcome is Disclosed in the Available Text.

High Court: Rajasthan High Court Bench: Jodhpur
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The matter comprised a batch of connected civil writ petitions listed before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The lead petition, S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13243/2026, was filed by Peer Mohammad Shah Jilani Dargah Samiti, Ramgarh District Jaisalmer through its Chairman, against the State of Rajasthan and various revenue and home department officials. Other connected petitions were filed by individuals, madarsas, and masjids from Jaisalmer, Barmer, and Bikaner districts, challenging actions by district collectors, superintendents of police, colonization officers, and tehsildars. The petitioners included religious and educational institutions such as Madarsa AI-E-Sunnat Faze-E-Asgariya, Jama Masjid Sadrau, Fatima Masjid, Noorani Masjid, and others. The respondents comprised state authorities including Principal Secretaries of Home and Revenue, District Collectors, Superintendents of Police, Deputy Commissioners of Colonization, and Tehsildars. No substantive facts, relief sought, or cause of action were discernible from the provided text. The document contained only case title pages and party arrays, along with a procedural note that D.B. SAW/882/2026 and one more matter had been filed and further orders should be referred. No legal issues, arguments, precedents, statutory provisions, judicial reasoning, or operative directions were included in the excerpt. The judgment text appeared to be an incomplete record of the proceedings, ending abruptly before any substantive content. Accordingly, the court's analysis and final decision could not be summarized.

Issue of Consideration

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 132432026

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (RAJ) (07) 33

S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13243/2026 (connected with S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 13244/2026, 13277/2026, 13281/2026, 13282/2026, 13284/2026, 13285/2026, 13299/2026, 13308/2026, 13311/2026, 13340/2026, 13352/2026, 13354/2026, 13363/2026, 13472/2026, 13617/2026, 13637/2026, 13858/2026)

2026:RJ-JP:30648

Peer Mohammad Shah Jilani Dargah Samiti, Ramgarh Dist. Jaisalmer Through Its Chairman Sh. Juma Khan S/o Burhan Khan (lead petitioner); and connected petitioners in S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 13244/2026, 13277/2026, 13281/2026, 13282/2026, 13284/2026, 13285/2026, 13299/2026, 13308/2026, 13311/2026, 13340/2026, 13352/2026, 13354/2026, 13363/2026, 13472/2026, 13617/2026, 13637/2026, 13858/2026

1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Principal Secretary Department Of Home Govt. Of Raj. Secretariate Jaipur; 2. District Collector, Jaisalmer; 3. Superintendent Of Police, Jaisalmer; 4. Deputy Commissioner, Colonization Dept. Jaisalmer; 5. Tehsildar Colonization, Ramgarh No. 2 Dist. Jaisalmer (lead respondents); and other state officials including Union of India, Chief Secretary, Principal Secretary Revenue, Collectors, Superintendents of Police, Deputy Commissioners, and Tehsildars in connected matters

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Multiple civil writ petitions by religious and educational institutions and individuals against state revenue and home department authorities.

Previous Decisions

Not mentioned; note indicates D.B. SAW/882/2026 and one more have been filed in this matter.

Procedural History

Multiple writ petitions listed together as connected matters. D.B. SAW/882/2026 and one more have been filed in this matter; further orders to be referred.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Under MPID Act Seeking Release of Attached Property — Property Acquired During Pendency of Criminal Proceedings Cannot Be Claimed as Bona Fide Purchaser Without Notice.
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute Over All-in-One Desktop Computers. Goods Classified as Portable Under Tariff Item 8471 30 10 Based on Weight and Transportability, Affecting Duty Valuation Under Central Excise Act, 194...