High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur Considers Writ Petitions Involving Bank Account Actions by Banks and Cyber Crime Authorities. The Petitions Pertain to Multiple Account Holders Seeking Relief Against Freezing or Restriction of Bank Accounts in Connection with Cyber Crime Investigations.

Case Note & Summary

The available text comprises the cause title and party details for multiple connected S.B. Civil Writ Petitions before the High Court of Judicature for Rajasthan at Jodhpur. The petitions, filed by various individual petitioners and one private limited company, name as respondents several public and private banks, the Reserve Bank of India, the Union of India through the Ministry of Home Affairs, the State of Rajasthan through the Director General of Police, the National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, Deputy Inspectors General of Police (Cyber Crime), and various police stations across states. The case numbers listed include S.B. Civil Writ Petition Nos. 9549/2026, 2911/2026, 9875/2026, 10355/2026, 11801/2026, 11886/2026, 11889/2026, 11901/2026, 11933/2026, 12050/2026, 12071/2026, 12087/2026, 12107/2026, 12122/2026, 12146/2026, 12164/2026, 12589/2026, 12766/2026, 12805/2026, and 12811/2026. The petitioners include Madna Ram, Smt. Gita Devi, Sunder Lal, Anil, Jai Kumar Gakhreja, Sangeeta, Preetimulti Millionaire Pvt. Ltd. through its Director Raju Ram, Sanjay Choudhary, Kheraj Ram, Mohammed Anis, Afroz Bargurjar, Ladaram, Sanjay Malviya, Aaipal Singh, Dharmendra Solanki, Jagdish Choudhary, Satpal Jhorar, Rama Ram, Nitish Sharma, and Priya Kanwar. The respondents include banks such as Bank of Baroda, Uco Bank, State Bank of India, ICICI Bank Ltd., Kotak Mahindra Bank, HDFC Bank Limited, RBL Bank, Canara Bank, IndusInd Bank, as well as the Reserve Bank of India, Union of India, State of Rajasthan, National Cyber Crime Reporting Portal, and various cyber crime police stations. The text does not set out the prayers, facts, legal grounds, arguments, or any interim or final directions. There are no citations, statutes, or precedents referenced. The only dates appearing are the upload date of 14 August 2026 and the download date of 17 September 2026, both of which are procedural and do not indicate the date of judgment. No bench, judge, or advocate names appear. Therefore, the substantive legal issues, ratio decidendi, and operative order cannot be extracted from the provided material. The title of the cases and the party array, however, suggest that the litigation involves actions by banks and cyber crime authorities in relation to bank accounts, possibly freezing or debiting of accounts, but this inference is not confirmed by the text and is noted only for context. The procedural history, previous decisions, and final outcome are not mentioned in the available excerpt.

Issue of Consideration