Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petition Seeking Mandamus for Property Survey with Police Protection. Direction Issued to Conduct Scheduled Survey and to Provide Police Assistance if Necessary.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Prosecution
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, owner of property in survey number 286/1A1G in Alangulam Village, Tenkasi District, filed an application dated 07.02.2025 to the Tahsildar and Head Surveyor for survey and boundary fixation as per revenue records. Citing inimical terms with neighbours, the petitioner also sought police protection from the Inspector of Police. A follow-up representation was made on 08.02.2025. The petitioner then approached the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, seeking a writ of mandamus for the survey and police protection. During hearing, the Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2 informed the court that the authorities had considered the application and fixed the survey for 17.03.2025. The court noted this and directed that if the first respondent required police protection, he should inform the third respondent, who would then provide necessary police force to protect the authorities and enable a peaceful survey. The petitioner was also directed to cooperate with the authorities. With these directions, the writ petition was disposed of without costs.

Headnote

A) Writ Jurisdiction - Mandamus - Survey and Police Protection - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - Petitioner sought writ of mandamus for survey of property and police protection due to inimical relations with neighbours - Respondents informed the court that survey was already scheduled for 17.03.2025 - Court directed the first respondent to intimate the third respondent if police protection was required and the third respondent to ensure availability of necessary police force for peaceful survey - Held that with these directions the petition is disposed of, with no order as to costs (Paras 2-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing revenue authorities to survey the petitioner's property and fix boundaries with police protection.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition was disposed of with a direction that the survey would be conducted on 17.03.2025, and if the first respondent required police protection, he should inform the third respondent, who would ensure availability of police force. The petitioner was directed to cooperate. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus under Article 226
  • survey of property
  • police protection for revenue authorities
  • duty to provide assistance when inimical relations exist
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 291

W.P.(MD)No.6963 of 2025

2025-03-14

P.B. Balaji

Mr. V.G. Vallarasu Chezhiyan for petitioner, Mr. B. Saravanan, Additional Government Pleader for respondents 1 & 2, Mr. S. Prakash, Government Advocate (Crl. Side) for respondent 3

Ramalakshmi

1. The Tahsildar, Alangulam Taluk, Tenkasi District; 2. The Head Surveyor, Alangulam Taluk, Tenkasi District; 3. The Inspector of Police, Alangulam Police Station, Alangulam Taluk, Tenkasi District

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus for survey of property and police protection.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents 1 and 2 to survey her property in S.No.286/1A1G and fix boundaries as per revenue records, with adequate police protection from the third respondent.

Filing Reason

Petitioner's application for survey was pending and she apprehended obstruction due to inimical relations with neighbours, necessitating police protection.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued directing the survey and boundary fixation with police assistance.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that she had applied for survey on 07.02.2025 and made a representation on 08.02.2025, and sought police protection due to strained relations with neighbours. Respondents 1 and 2 submitted that the survey had been scheduled for 17.03.2025.

Ratio Decidendi

When a statutory authority has already scheduled the requested action (survey), a writ of mandamus is not required; the court can issue directions to facilitate the action, including police protection if necessary, and dispose of the petition.

Judgment Excerpts

the respondents have considered the petitioner's application and fixed the date for survey on 17.03.2025 In the event of the first respondent requiring any police protection, he shall intimate the third respondent regarding the said requirement, who shall ensure availability of necessary police force for protecting the authorities and to enable them to conduct peaceful survey on 17.03.2025 this Writ Petition stands disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed an application for survey on 07.02.2025, followed by a representation on 08.02.2025. The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, and after hearing the parties, the court disposed of the petition on 14.03.2025 with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Considers Contempt Petition for Alleged Wilful Disobedience of Land Allotment Order. Court Observed That Mere Disobedience Insufficient and That Possession Could Not Be Taken Due to Pending Civil Suit, Thus No Contempt Established U...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Cooperative Society Membership Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration of Notice Service. The court held that the authorities must consider evidence of service of notice before refusing approval for rem...