Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Directing Police to Complete Enquiry into Complaint for Recovery of Two-Wheeler. Court holds that in writ jurisdiction under Article 226, direction can be given to police authorities to expeditiously complete ongoing enquiry without issuing notice to private parties, where no adverse order is passed against them.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court seeking a writ of mandamus directing the police authorities (Respondents 1 and 2) to conduct an enquiry and recover her TVS Scooty Zest two-wheeler, bearing registration number TN 49 CF 9807, from the private respondents (Respondents 3 and 4). The complaint dated 23.12.2024 had been lodged with the police, but no action was taken. The petitioner alleged that her vehicle was in the possession of the private respondents and sought its recovery through police intervention. The legal issue was whether a writ of mandamus could be issued to direct the police to complete an enquiry and recover the vehicle. The Additional Public Prosecutor, appearing for the police respondents, submitted that the complaint had been received and was under enquiry, and that the enquiry would be completed within one week. The court, considering the limited scope of the prayer and that no adverse order was being passed against the private respondents, disposed of the writ petition without issuing notice to the private parties. The court directed the second respondent, the Inspector of Police, Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, to complete the enquiry within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of the order. The petition was disposed of with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Mandamus - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - Petition filed under Article 226 seeking mandamus directing police officers to conduct enquiry and recover petitioner's two-wheeler from private respondents based on complaint. Additional Public Prosecutor submitted complaint received and under enquiry, to be completed within one week. Held, considering limited scope, court directed second respondent to complete enquiry within one week without issuing notice to private respondents (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the court should issue a writ of mandamus under Article 226 directing the police authorities to conduct enquiry and recover the petitioner's vehicle based on complaint.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the second respondent to complete the enquiry within one week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. No costs.

Law Points

  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Police Duty to Enquire
  • Expeditious Disposal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 271

W.P.(MD)No.5521 of 2025

2025-03-03

P. Dhanabal, J.

Mr. C. Senthil Murugan, Mr. R.M. Anbunithi

P. Ramya

1.The Superintendent of Police, Thanjavur District. 2.The Inspector of Police, Thiruvaiyaru Police Station, Thanjavur District. 3.Swaminathan 4.Sakthivel

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 seeking mandamus for police enquiry and recovery of vehicle.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought direction to respondents 1 & 2 to conduct enquiry and recover her TVS Scooty Zest two wheeler bearing Reg.No.TN 49 CF 9807 from respondents 3 & 4.

Filing Reason

Failure of police to take action on complaint dated 23.12.2024 regarding recovery of vehicle.

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued directing police to complete enquiry on a complaint regarding recovery of a vehicle.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argues that police have not taken action on complaint, hence seeks direction for enquiry and recovery. Additional Public Prosecutor submits that complaint is under enquiry and will be completed within one week.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a complaint is pending enquiry, the High Court under Article 226 can direct the concerned police authority to complete the enquiry expeditiously.

Judgment Excerpts

the complaint of the petitioner was received and the same is under enquiry. However, the respondents will complete the enquiry within a period of one [1] week. this Court without even issuing notice to the private parties directs the second respondent to complete the enquiry within a period of one [1] week from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed complaint dated 23.12.2024 with police. No action taken, hence writ petition filed. On 03.03.2025, court heard the matter and disposed with directions.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes Writ Petition Directing Police to Complete Enquiry into Complaint for Recovery of Two-Wheeler. Court holds that in writ jurisdiction under Article 226, direction can be given to police authorities to expeditiously complete ...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Magistrate's Order Reversing Fund Transfer in Cyber Fraud Case — Petitioner's Bank Account Used for Fraudulent Transaction Without Consent. The Court Held That a Magistrate Cannot Direct Reversal of Bank Transfers Un...