Madras High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Denying Tax Exemption on Student Notebooks Under TNVAT Act. Exercise Notebooks Exemption Under Government Order Applies to Standard Ruled and Unruled Notebooks Manufactured by Dealer.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal In Favour of Accused
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

ITC Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956 and a dealer under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2007, engaged in marketing and selling student notebooks and stationery products, filed returns claiming exemption on the turnover from sales of student notebooks. The assessing authority initially accepted the returns under Section 22(2) and determined refunds, but subsequently took up the returns for detailed scrutiny under Section 22(3) and issued pre-assessment proposals. One of the issues was the denial of exemption claimed on student notebooks. The assessing officer relied on G.O. Ms. No. 79 dated 23.03.2007, which exempted 'Graph and Exercise note books', but concluded that the notebooks manufactured by the petitioner did not satisfy the stipulation. The petitioner contended that the exemption applied to its standard ruled and unruled exercise notebooks and that it had clarified in its replies that it manufactured only such notebooks. The respondents defended the assessment orders, arguing that the exemption was specific and the petitioner failed to provide details of different types of notebooks. The court examined the relevant entries in the schedules to the Act and the Government Order. It noted that student notebooks could be classified into ruled and unruled, with distinct categories for laboratory, graph, and copy books. The court found that the petitioner's notebooks, being regular blanks or ruled exercise notebooks, fell within the definition of 'exercise notebooks' under the Government Order. The assessing officer's observation that the petitioner had not furnished breakup of graph, exercise, and other notebooks was incorrect, as the petitioner had categorically confirmed that only standard ruled and unruled exercise notebooks were sold. The court applied the literal rule of interpretation of taxing statutes, relying on Govindaswamy Binding Works v State of Andhra Pradesh and Cape Brandy Syndicate v Inland Revenue Commissioners, and held that there was no room for intendment. The court quashed the impugned assessment orders for the years 2006-07 to 2010-11 insofar as they denied the exemption and taxed the turnover at 4%, allowing the writ petitions and granting the exemption.

Headnote

A) Taxation - Exemption Interpretation - Scope of Exemption for 'Exercise Notebooks' under Government Order - Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2007, Section 30(1) and G.O. Ms. No. 79 dated 23.03.2007 - The court interpreted the term 'exercise notebooks' in the exemption notification to include standard ruled and unruled notebooks manufactured by the petitioner, rejecting the revenue's narrow classification. Held that the exemption is applicable as the petitioner only sold basic exercise notebooks, and the assessing officer's distinction was unfounded in light of the clarifications provided. (Paras 13-20)

B) Interpretation of Statutes - Taxing Statutes - Literal Rule - General - The court relied on the principle that in a taxing statute, one must look at what is clearly said without any room for intendment, as held in Govindaswamy Binding Works v State of Andhra Pradesh citing Cape Brandy Syndicate v Inland Revenue Commissioners. Held that the plain meaning of 'exercise notebooks' must be given effect to, and the revenue cannot import additional restrictions. (Paras 21-22)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to exemption from tax under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2007 and G.O. Ms. No. 79 dated 23.03.2007 in respect of sale of student notebooks, and whether such notebooks qualify as 'exercise notebooks' covered by the exemption.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petitions are allowed; the impugned assessment orders are quashed insofar as they deny exemption on the sale of student notebooks and tax them at 4%. The petitioner is entitled to exemption under G.O. Ms. No. 79 dated 23.03.2007 for its standard ruled and unruled exercise notebooks.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • In a taxing statute
  • one must look at what is said without any room for intendment
  • Exemption notification must be interpreted as per its plain language
  • The term 'exercise notebooks' includes standard ruled and unruled notebooks used by students
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (03) 73

W.P.No. 31586, 31587, 31588, 32373 & 32374 of 2014 and M.P.Nos. 2,2,2,2,3,3,3 & 2 of 2014

2025-03-05

Dr. Justice Anita Sumanth, Mrs. Justice R. Hemalatha

Citation not available, 2025:MHC:690

Mr. C. Manishankar, Senior Counsel for Mr. K. Krishnamoorthy; Mr. Haja Nazirudeen, Additional Advocate General assisted by Mr. TNC Kaushik, Additional Government Pleader (Taxes)

ITC Limited (Rep. by its Head of Finance - Education & Stationery Products Business) Mr. P. Ramkumar

The Deputy Commissioner (CT)-I, Large Tax Payers Unit, Chennai; and The State of Tamil Nadu, Rep. by its Secretary CT & R Department (B2), Fort St. George, Chennai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions challenging assessment orders under the Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2007 denying exemption claimed on sale of student notebooks.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of certiorari to quash the assessment orders insofar as they denied exemption on the turnover of student notebooks and taxed them at 4%.

Filing Reason

The assessing officer denied the exemption claimed on the ground that the notebooks manufactured by the petitioner did not fall within the exempted category of 'exercise notebooks' under the relevant Government Order.

Previous Decisions

Assessment orders dated 29.10.2014 to 21.11.2014 for assessment years 2006-07 to 2010-11, which denied the exemption claimed under the TNVAT Act and G.O. Ms. No. 79.

Issues

Whether the assessment orders denying exemption on student notebooks under the TNVAT Act and relevant Government Order are sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: The exemption under G.O. Ms. No. 79 dated 23.03.2007, Serial No.15, which exempts 'Graph and Exercise note books', applies to the petitioner's standard ruled and unruled exercise notebooks; the assessing authority's distinction between different kinds of notebooks is unfounded, and the petitioner had clarified in its replies that it only manufactures such notebooks. Respondent: The exemption is limited to specific graph and exercise notebooks, and the petitioner failed to furnish break-up of different notebooks; the notebooks manufactured by petitioner are distinguishable and not covered by the exemption under the Act or the GO.

Ratio Decidendi

The term 'exercise notebooks' in G.O. Ms. No. 79 dated 23.03.2007 must be interpreted in its plain and ordinary meaning; standard ruled and unruled notebooks used by students for exercises fall within the exemption. In a taxing statute, the literal rule applies, and there is no room for intendment. Clarifications provided by the assessee that it only deals in such notebooks must be accepted in the absence of any material to the contrary.

Judgment Excerpts

The notebooks manufactured by petitioners being regular notebooks either blank or ruled, for student exercises would, in our considered view, satisfy that definition. In the replies filed, the petitioner has categorically confirmed that the notebooks sold by it are either ruled or unruled exercise notebooks only. In a taxing statute, one has to only look at what is said without any room for intendment.

Procedural History

Returns filed by petitioner under TNVAT Act claiming exemption for student notebooks; orders under Section 22(2) initially accepted returns and granted refund; subsequently, detailed scrutiny under Section 22(3) issued pre-assessment proposals; petitioner filed replies; impugned assessment orders dated 29.10.2014 to 21.11.2014 for assessment years 2006-07 to 2010-11 passed denying exemption and taxing turnover at 4%; writ petitions filed under Article 226 challenging these orders.

Acts & Sections

  • Tamil Nadu Value Added Tax Act, 2007: Section 22(2), Section 22(3), Section 30(1), First Schedule/Part B/Entries 47 and 132, Fourth Schedule/Part B/Entry 55(f)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Quashes Assessment Orders Denying Tax Exemption on Student Notebooks Under TNVAT Act. Exercise Notebooks Exemption Under Government Order Applies to Standard Ruled and Unruled Notebooks Manufactured by Dealer.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Territorial Army Ex-Havildar Seeking Pension Due to Insufficient Embodied Service. Service Pension Under Pension Regulations for the Army, 1961, Regulation 132 Requires 15 Years Actually Rendered Service, ...