Search Results for "Trademark Infringement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Trademark Infringement"

139 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 139 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Pharmaceutical Marks 'MONTINA' and 'MONTINAL'. Phonetic Similarity Between Registered Mark 'MONTINA' and Defendants' Mark 'MONTINAL' for Medicinal Preparations Constitutes Infringement Under Section 29(2)(b) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

24 Dec 2013

The Plaintiff, Aristo Pharmaceuticals Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the Defendants, who were manufacturin...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Injunction Set Aside Due to Vague Pleadings and Lack of Prima Facie Case. The court held that without proper proof of trademark ownership and clear pleadings, an interim injunction cannot be granted under the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

21 Sep 2013

The case involves an appeal against an interim injunction granted by the Principal District Judge, Pune, restraining the appellants from using the tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — Registered Proprietor's Rights Protected Against Deceptively Similar Marks. The court affirmed the trial court's order granting interim injunction restraining the defendant from using marks deceptively similar to the plaintiff's registered trademark 'Prem Mehandi Centre' under Sections 28, 29, 134 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.

19 Oct 2016

The respondent/plaintiff, proprietor of 'Prem Mehandi Centre', filed two suits (Suit No. 1 of 2015 and Suit No. 2 of 2015) against the appellants/defe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit Over 'BADEMIYA' Mark. Plaintiffs' registered trademarks 'BADEMIYA'S' and 'BADEMIYA' in Classes 29 and 42 are infringed by defendant's use of 'BADEMIYAN' for similar food business.

25 Mar 2011

The plaintiffs, a partnership firm and its partners, filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against the defendant. The plaintiffs' bu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.

13 Jan 2014

The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Sales Tax Reference on Levy of Purchase Tax on Inter-State Purchases of Raw Materials Used in Manufacture of Exported Goods. The court framed a question of law regarding the applicability of Section 8(3)(b) of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 to inter-State purchases of raw materials used in exports.

21 Nov 2025

The applicant, M/s. Duphar Interfran Ltd., is a company engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical products. It purchased raw materials from outside...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Trademark Infringement Case — Eurobond Industries v. Euro Panel Products. Passing off and trademark infringement established due to deceptive similarity between 'Eurobond' and 'Euro' marks.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a commercial appeal filed by Eurobond Industries Private Limited (the appellant/defendant) against Euro Panel Products Pvt. Limited ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Plaintiff's Motion in Trade Mark Infringement Case Involving Use of Registered Mark as Corporate Name for Dissimilar Goods. The Full Bench overruled Raymond Ltd v Raymond Pharmaceuticals Pvt Ltd and held that Section 29(5) of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 provides a separate cause of action for infringement when a registered trade mark is used as a corporate or trading name, even for dissimilar goods.

1 Mar 2017

The case involves a Notice of Motion in a suit filed by CIPLA Limited against M/s. CIPLA Industries Private Limited and Vishal Khanna for alleged infr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Injunction Against Eris Lifesciences in Trademark Infringement Case. Phonetic Similarity Between 'NEBISTAR' and 'NEBISTOL' Leads to Restraint Order Under Trade Marks Act, 1999.

23 Dec 2015

The Plaintiff, Lupin Limited, filed a suit alleging that the Defendants, Eris Lifesciences Pvt. Ltd. and others, were infringing its registered tradem...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement in Favor of Plaintiff. Passing Off Claim Deferred Due to Pending Rectification Proceedings Under Section 124 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

11 Apr 2012

The plaintiffs, Hem Corporation Pvt. Ltd. and three individuals (erstwhile partners of a firm), filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing of...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)