Madras High Court Upholds Teacher's Claim for Incentive Increment and Refund Following Equivalence Declaration. The Court Directs Grant of Increment and Refund of Rs.1,65,760 Recovered Under Recovery Order Dated 07.07.2016, as G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16.06.2022 Recognized B.P.Ed. Degree Equivalence.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai In Favour of Accused
  • 41
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The dispute arose from the denial of incentive increment to a Physical Education Teacher after the recovery of amounts earlier granted for acquiring a B.P.Ed. degree. The petitioner was appointed as Physical Education Teacher on 13.03.1998. He obtained a B.P.Ed. degree through Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University in 2009 and was granted incentive increment from 06.05.2009. Subsequently, the audit department objected to the grant, and the third respondent issued a recovery order dated 07.07.2016 directing refund of Rs.1,65,760 along with other allowances. The recovery was based on the ground that the degree was not equivalent to B.P.Ed. degrees offered by other universities. Later, the State Government issued G.O.(Ms).No.106, School Education Department, dated 16.06.2022, accepting the recommendations of the 15th Equivalence Committee and declaring that the B.P.Ed. degree from Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University is equivalent to degrees from other universities. The order specifically stated that candidates admitted and completing the course during 2009, 2010, and 2011 are entitled to the benefit. Following this, the third respondent passed an order dated 17.10.2023 restoring the incentive increment, but the monetary benefits were not disbursed. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition seeking a mandamus to direct respondents 2 and 3 to disburse the incentive increment and implement the restoration order in light of the 2022 government order. The petitioner contended that the recovery order was illegal as it violated principles of natural justice, no notice was issued before passing it, and now the very basis of the recovery—non-equivalence—had been removed by the government order. The respondents argued that at the time of the recovery order, the degree was not declared equivalent, but later it was declared equivalent. The court noted that the sole ground for the recovery proceedings was the non-equivalence of the degree. Once the government declared equivalence through G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16.06.2022, the foundation of the recovery order vanished. The court thus disposed of the writ petition with directions to the respondents to grant the incentive increment to the petitioner for acquiring the B.P.Ed. degree in light of the said government order and to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner forthwith. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Incentive Increment - Equivalence of Degrees - Government Order G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16.06.2022 - After the State Government declared the B.P.Ed. degree from Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University equivalent to degrees from other universities, the sole ground for issuing the recovery order against the petitioner vanished. The court directed the respondents to grant the incentive increment from 06.05.2009 and refund the recovered amount, holding that the petitioner is entitled to the benefit under the government order. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to incentive increment for acquiring B.P.Ed. degree from Ramakrishna Mission Vivekananda University after the government declared the degree equivalent to degrees from other universities, and whether the recovery order passed earlier should be set aside.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition disposed of with directions to respondents to grant incentive increment to petitioner for acquiring B.P.Ed. degree in light of G.O.(Ms)No.106 dated 16.06.2022 and to refund the amount recovered from petitioner forthwith. No costs.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • equivalence of degrees
  • incentive increment for higher qualification
  • principles of natural justice
  • writ of mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 296

W.P.(MD) No.31442 of 2024

2025-02-03

Battu Devanand

Citation not available

Mr.J.Lawrance for petitioner; Mr.T.Amjad Khan, Government Advocate for respondents 2 & 3

P.Mohanasundaram

The Regional Accounts Officer (Audit), School Education Department, Madurai Region; The Chief Educational Officer, Dindigul District; The Headmaster, Municipality Higher Secondary School, Palani

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to direct the respondents to disburse incentive increment for higher qualification.

Remedy Sought

Direction to respondents 2 and 3 to disburse incentive increment for B.P.Ed. degree w.e.f. 06.05.2009 and implement order dated 17.10.2023 in light of G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16.06.2022.

Filing Reason

Despite the government order declaring equivalence, the respondents did not disburse the incentive increment and the earlier recovery order had been passed.

Previous Decisions

Third respondent passed recovery order dated 07.07.2016 directing refund of Rs.1,65,760; third respondent later passed order dated 17.10.2023 restoring incentive increment but benefits not paid.

Issues

Entitlement to incentive increment for B.P.Ed. degree after government declaration of equivalence. Validity of recovery order in light of G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16.06.2022 and whether refund of recovered amount is warranted.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner: Recovery order illegal for violation of natural justice (no notice); degree equivalence now declared; restoration order passed but benefits not paid. Respondents: At time of recovery order, degree not declared equivalent; later G.O. declared equivalence.

Ratio Decidendi

Once the government declares a degree as equivalent for the purpose of incentive increment, the earlier recovery order based on non-equivalence becomes unsustainable and the employee is entitled to grant of incentive increment and refund of recovered amount from the date of acquisition.

Judgment Excerpts

the only ground for issuance of the recovery proceedings... is that the B.P.Ed., Degree possessed by the petitioner... is not equivalent to B.P.Ed., Degrees offered by the other universities. But as of now, the Government issued G.O.(Ms).No.106... stating that the B.P.Ed., Degree possessed by the petitioner is equivalent those candidates who have been admitted and completed the B.P.Ed., Courses during the years 2009, 2010 & 2011 are entitled for the said benefit. the respondents are directed to grant incentive increment to the petitioner for acquiring B.P.Ed., Degree in light of G.O. (Ms)No.106 the respondents are directed to refund the amount recovered from the petitioner, pursuant to the recovery order forthwith.

Procedural History

Petitioner appointed as Physical Education Teacher on 13.03.1998. Acquired B.P.Ed. degree in 2009. Granted incentive increment from 06.05.2009. Audit objections raised; third respondent passed recovery order dated 07.07.2016 directing refund of Rs.1,65,760. Government issued G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16.06.2022 declaring equivalence. Third respondent passed order dated 17.10.2023 restoring incentive increment, but monetary benefits not paid. Petitioner filed W.P.(MD) No.31442 of 2024.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Upholds Teacher's Claim for Incentive Increment and Refund Following Equivalence Declaration. The Court Directs Grant of Increment and Refund of Rs.1,65,760 Recovered Under Recovery Order Dated 07.07.2016, as G.O.Ms.No.106 dated 16....
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Employees by Goa State Pollution Control Board. Abolition of Posts Held Mala Fide and Termination Violative of Principles of Natural Justice.