Search Results for "Incentive Increment"

31 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 31 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition to Dismiss Corrupt Employee Despite Minor Wage Deduction. Serious misconduct of diverting octroi refund and receiving illegal gratification outweighs technical non-compliance under Section 33(2)(b) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, challenged the judgment and order dated 7 May 2010 passed by the Industrial Tribunal, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Appeals of Teachers Against Withdrawal of Incentive Increment for Higher Educational Qualifications — Held That Incentive Increment Once Granted Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Authority of Law and That G.O.Ms.No.324 of 1995 Removes Restriction on Subject Specialization.

The case involves a batch of writ appeals filed by teachers (Secondary Grade Teachers, B.T Assistants, Elementary School Headmasters, and Middle Schoo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Directs Restoration of Incentive Increment to Physical Education Teacher After Equivalence Declaration of B.P.Ed. Degree. Government Order Removing Basis for Recovery Leads to Direction for Grant of Increment and Refund of Rs.3,65,872.

The petitioner, a Physical Education Teacher appointed on 09.06.1998 in a government school, acquired a B.P.Ed. degree in 2009 from Ramakrishna Missio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Adjudicates Petition for Restoration of Incentive Increment. Government Order G.O.Ms.No.106 on Higher Qualifications Considered.

This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by a Physical Education Teacher seeking incentive increment for acquiring...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Teacher’s Writ Petition for Restoration of Incentive Increment for B.P.Ed. Degree. Incentive Increment Must Be Disbursed from Date of Qualification Acquisition in Accordance with Government Order G.O.Ms.No.106.

The writ petition was filed before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Management's Appeal in Service Regulation Dispute Over Annual Increment. Employees Entitled to Increment Earned One Day Before Retirement Under Regulation 40(1) of Karnataka Electricity Board Employees Service Regulations, 1997, as They Completed Required Service Period.

The dispute arose between the management of KPTCL and its employees regarding the entitlement to an annual increment earned one day prior to retiremen...