Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Run Water Purification Plant; Permits Petitioners to Operate Plant as Volunteers. Plant Installed Under Central Government Scheme Had Expired and Panchayat Failed to Take Over; Court Held That Petitioners Can Run It Without Acquiring Any Rights.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

Two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by individuals S. Sivaraman and M. Navaneethabalan seeking writs of mandamus to direct the authorities to run and re-open a Reverse Osmosis water purification plant situated at Thiruppattur Taluk, Sivagangai District. The plant had been installed in 2012 as part of a pilot project under the Technology Mission Cell (Water and Clean Energy) of the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India. The scheme envisaged that the Central Government would operate the plant for two years, after which the Village Panchayat would take over; however, the Panchayat failed to do so, leading the Central Government to extend the scheme for three more years. The extended period expired in 2017, and no further action was taken, leaving the plant in a state of disuse. The keys to the plant had been handed over to the Village Panchayat. The petitioners approached the High Court in 2018, contending that the plant was a public asset necessary for the supply of clean drinking water and should be revived. The Deputy Solicitor General appearing for the Central Government submitted that the scheme period had lapsed and that the responsibility had shifted to the Panchayat, which had not come forward; the Central Government could not be compelled to continue operations indefinitely. The court, presided over by Chief Justice K.R. Shriram and Justice V. Lakshminarayanan, observed that the project had become unviable and that no party was willing to take up the matter. In the interest of the villagers, the court proposed that the petitioners, who claimed to be acting in public interest, could approach the Panchayat, obtain the keys, and themselves run the plant voluntarily. The court clearly stated that this would not confer any ownership or rights on the petitioners, and they would act merely as ‘good samaritans’. No writ of mandamus was issued, and the petitions were disposed of accordingly without any order as to costs, with the connected miscellaneous petition closed.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law – Writ of Mandamus – Public Interest Litigation – Revival of Defunct Water Purification Plant – Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 – The Central Government scheme for water purification plants, installed in 2012, required the Village Panchayat to take over after two years, later extended, but the Panchayat did not take over and the plant fell into disuse. In a PIL seeking mandamus to run the plant, the court permitted the petitioners to contact the Panchayat, take the key, and run the plant voluntarily as ‘good samaritans’ to serve the villagers, without conferring any ownership or rights over the plant. Held that the petitioners have no right on the plant and would only act as good samaritans. (Paras 1-4).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued to direct the respondents to run or re-open a defunct water purification plant under a Central Government scheme that had expired

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petitions disposed of without costs; petitioners permitted to contact the Panchayat, obtain the key, and run the plant voluntarily as good samaritans, without any ownership or right over the plant.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • Writ of Mandamus
  • Public Interest Litigation
  • Scheme expiry
  • voluntary operation of plant
  • no right conferred
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 248

W.P.(MD) Nos.24122 & 24306 of 2018

2025-02-14

K.R. Shriram, Chief Justice and V. Lakshminarayanan, J.

Citation not available

Mrs.A.Banumathy, Mr.A.Abdul Wahab, Mr.K.Govindarajan, Mr.P.Thilak Kumar, Mr.M.Rajarajan, Mr.R.Murugaboopathy

S. Sivaraman and M. Navaneethabalan

Director, Technology Mission Cell; Home Secretary, Government of Tamil Nadu; Director of Town Panchayats; District Collector, Sivagangai; Assistant Director of Town Panchayats; Executive Officer, Thiruppattur Town Panchayat; Water System India Private Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus to direct authorities to run and re-open a non-functional water purification plant.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a direction to the respondents to operate and re-open the RO plant situated at Thiruppattur, Sivagangai District.

Filing Reason

The plant, installed under a Central Government scheme, had fallen into disuse after the scheme expired and the Panchayat failed to take over, depriving villagers of clean water.

Previous Decisions

Previous decisions not referenced

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus should be issued to direct the respondents to run or re-open the water purification plant when the underlying scheme had expired and the local body had not assumed responsibility.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners contended that the plant, a public asset, should be revived for public benefit. Respondent 1 (Central Government) submitted that the scheme period had expired and responsibility was shifted to the Panchayat, which failed to act; the Central Government could not be compelled to continue operations indefinitely.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a pilot project scheme has lapsed and the local body fails to take over, the court may allow public-spirited individuals to voluntarily operate the public utility without acquiring any proprietary or legal rights, rather than issuing a mandamus to the state.

Judgment Excerpts

as per the Scheme, the Water Purification Plant was installed sometime in 2012. the Central Government was to run the plant for two years and the Village Panchayat was to take over thereafter. further three year period expired sometime in 2017. Petitioners may contact the Panchayat, take the key and run the plant. Certainly, that will not make the petitioners owners of the plant and the petitioners will not have any right on the plant. The role of the petitioners will be as good samaritans to help their villagers.

Procedural History

The writ petitions were filed in 2018 and were taken up together before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court. After hearing submissions, they were disposed of by common order on 14.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India, 1950: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Seeking Mandamus to Run Water Purification Plant; Permits Petitioners to Operate Plant as Volunteers. Plant Installed Under Central Government Scheme Had Expired and Panchayat Failed to Take Over; Court He...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision by Tenant Company in Eviction Suit Based on Landlord's Reasonable and Bonafide Requirement. Transfer of Shares by Tenant Company to Co-owner Does Not Constitute Subletting Under Section 16(1)(e) of Maharashtra Ren...