Madras High Court Dismisses as Withdrawn Habeas Corpus Petition Seeking Production of Detenu. Wife's Petition for Husband's Production Withdrawn Without Adjudication.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Madurai
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, the wife of the detenu, filed a habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court. The petition sought a direction to the Commissioner of Police, Madurai City, and the Inspector of Police, Annanagar Police Station, to produce her husband, Mohammed Arif, aged 25 years, and set him at liberty. The prayer referenced dates of 20.09.2024 and 5.1.2025, presumably the filing dates. The case came up for hearing on 05.02.2025 before a division bench comprising Dr. Justice G. Jayachandran and Justice R. Poornima. At the hearing, counsel for the petitioner informed the court that the petitioner wished to withdraw the habeas corpus petition and had made an endorsement to that effect. The court recorded the submission and, in view of the withdrawal request, dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No arguments were advanced on the merits of the illegal detention claim, and the court did not examine any factual or legal issues. The order is a straightforward dismissal upon withdrawal without any directions or observations. There is no ratio decidendi as the case was not adjudicated. The private respondents (3 to 5) were not represented by counsel, and the state respondents were represented by the Additional Public Prosecutor.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Habeas Corpus - Withdrawal - Constitution of India, Article 226 - The habeas corpus petition was filed seeking production of the detenu, Mohammed Arif, alleging illegal detention. On the date of hearing, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition and made an endorsement to that effect. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn. No adjudication on merits occurred. (Paras 1-2).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

H.C.P(MD)No.162 of 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Law Points

  • Habeas corpus petition dismissed as withdrawn
  • no legal principles adjudicated
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 221

H.C.P(MD)No.162 of 2025

2025-02-05

Dr. G. Jayachandran, R. Poornima

Mr. S. Radhakrishnan (Petitioner), Mr. E. Antony Sahaya Prabahar (Additional Public Prosecutor for Respondents 1 and 2)

S. Divyaprabha

1. The Commissioner of Police, Madurai City; 2. The Inspector of Police, Annanagar Police Station; 3. Basheer Ahamed; 4. Rihana; 5. Fahima

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Habeas corpus petition under Article 226 of the Constitution alleging illegal detention

Remedy Sought

A direction to the Commissioner of Police and Inspector of Police to produce the detenu Mohammed Arif before the Court and set him at liberty

Filing Reason

Believed illegal detention of the petitioner's husband Mohammed Arif by the respondents

Previous Decisions

None

Submissions/Arguments

The learned counsel for the Petitioner sought permission of the Court to withdraw the Habeas Corpus Petition and made an endorsement to that effect.

Ratio Decidendi

No ratio decidendi as the matter was dismissed as withdrawn without adjudication on merits.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this Habeas Corpus Petition and has also made an endorsement to that effect. In view of the same, the Habeas Corpus Petition is dismissed as withdrawn.

Procedural History

A habeas corpus petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by the wife of the detenu, seeking production of Mohammed Arif and his release from illegal detention. The petition bore dates of 20.09.2024 and 5.1.2025. The matter came up before the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court on 05.02.2025. On that date, the petitioner’s counsel sought withdrawal, and the Court dismissed the petition as withdrawn without any hearing on merits.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Emergency Leave for Convict to Attend Sick Mother, Sets Aside Rejection Order. Prisoner's Good Conduct and Probation Officer's Recommendation Justify Grant of Emergency Leave Under Article 226 of Constitution of India.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Widow and Minor Child in Motor Accident Claim — Negligence of Lorry Driver Established. The court modified the Tribunal's award under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, increasing compe...