Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Directing Coimbatore Corporation to Remove Unauthorised Construction of Pallivasal. Court Holds That Construction Without Planning Permission Is Illegal and Must Be Removed, Permitting Respondents to Apply for Building Plan Permission Afresh.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India by a licensed building engineer and active participant in the activities of the fourth respondent’s Pallivasal, seeking a mandamus to direct the Coimbatore Corporation to remove unauthorised construction of a new masjid. The petitioner alleged that in February 2024, respondents 4 and 5 demolished the old building and began new construction without obtaining planning permission. Despite the petitioner’s advice to secure necessary approvals, the construction continued. The Corporation admitted that no planning permission was obtained and issued a stop work notice on 05.11.2024. Respondents 4 and 5 contended that the work was a renovation permitted by the Tamil Nadu Wakf Board and that they had appealed for exemption. The court examined photographs showing demolition and new construction, and held that even renovation requires permission from the Corporation. It emphasized that unauthorised constructions in urban areas cause public inconvenience and cannot be permitted. The court concluded that the action of respondents 4 and 5 was illegal. Accordingly, the writ petition was allowed; the first respondent was directed to remove the unauthorised constructions within four weeks, with liberty to respondents 4 and 5 to obtain building plan permission afresh and proceed in accordance with law. No costs were awarded.

Headnote

A) Municipal Law / Urban Planning - Requirement of Planning Permission - Unauthorised Construction - [Act not specified] - Even renovation work requires permission from the Corporation; construction without planning permission is illegal and violative of the Act. Held: The first respondent is directed to remove the unauthorised constructions within four weeks (Paras 6-8).

B) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction under Article 226 - Mandamus - Constitution of India, 1950, Article 226 - Where a building is constructed without planning permission and the municipal authority admits the illegality, a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct removal of the unauthorised construction to prevent public inconvenience (Paras 5,7,8).

C) Religious Institutions - Municipal Permission Independent of Wakf Board Approval - The permission of the Wakf Board does not exempt religious institutions from obtaining planning permission from the municipal corporation; the requirement of planning permission under municipal law is independent and mandatory (Paras 3,5,6).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct the municipal corporation to take action against unauthorized construction of a religious building.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The first respondent is directed to remove the unauthorised constructions within four weeks. Respondents 4 and 5 are permitted to obtain building plan permission afresh and proceed in accordance with law. No costs.

Law Points

  • Legal points not extracted
  • Unauthorised construction without planning permission is illegal
  • renovation also requires permission from the local authority
  • urban constructions must comply with planning regulations
  • writ of mandamus lies to direct removal of unauthorized construction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 128

W.P. No. 15221 of 2024

2025-02-05

S.M. Subramaniam, K. Rajasekar

Citation not available, 2025:MHC:351

L. Mouli, N. Umapathi, Avinash Wadhwani, N.A. Nissar Ahamed, N.A. Nassir Hussain

R. Syed Mahbool

The Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation and Others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking mandamus to direct municipal corporation to remove unauthorised construction of a religious building.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a direction to the first respondent (Commissioner, Coimbatore Corporation) to take action against respondents 4 and 5 for unauthorised construction of a new Pallivasal.

Filing Reason

Respondents 4 and 5 demolished the old building and began constructing a new mosque without obtaining planning permission from the local authority, despite the petitioner’s advice.

Previous Decisions

Previous decisions not referenced

Issues

Whether a writ of mandamus can be issued to direct the removal of unauthorised construction when no planning permission has been obtained. Whether permission from the Wakf Board exempts the construction from the requirement of planning permission under municipal law.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the construction was unauthorised and sought removal. Respondents 4 & 5 argued that the construction was a renovation with permission from the Wakf Board and they had appealed for exemption. The Corporation stated that no planning permission was obtained and the construction is illegal.

Ratio Decidendi

Unauthorised construction without planning permission is illegal and must be removed by the municipal authority. Even renovation work requires permission. A writ of mandamus may issue to compel removal of such construction in urban areas to prevent public inconvenience. (Paras 6-8)

Judgment Excerpts

The photographs enclosed by the petitioner along with the typedset of papers would reveal that the old structure was demolished and new construction works commenced under the guise of renovation. Even for renovation work, necessary permission from the Corporation is required. Illegality in the matter of construction in urban areas at no circumstances be permitted, as such unauthorised constructions are causing greater inconvenience to the public in general. Therefore, the first respondent is directed to remove the unauthorised constructions within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed and the court heard arguments from all sides. On 05.11.2024, a stop work notice was issued by the Corporation. The court considered the matter and passed the final order on 05.02.2025.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Quashes Termination Order of Anganwadi Worker for Violation of Natural Justice. Court Directs Disbursement of Retirement Benefits and Permits Superannuation, Treating Absence as No Work No Pay.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition Directing Coimbatore Corporation to Remove Unauthorised Construction of Pallivasal. Court Holds That Construction Without Planning Permission Is Illegal and Must Be Removed, Permitting Respondents to Apply for B...