High Court of Madras Considers Review Application in Labour Dispute Over Security Guards' Employment Status. Application Filed Under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC Against Division Bench Judgment in W.A.No.424 of 2021.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

This review application was filed by the Management of Ennore Thermal Power Station, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, under Order XLVII Rule 1 read with Section 114 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to review the Division Bench judgment dated 10.11.2023 in W.A.No.424 of 2021. The writ appeal concerned a dispute relating to security services and the employment status of security guards. Multiple respondents were impleaded, including the Presiding Officer of the Principal Labour Court, Chennai, several security service companies, and a large number of individual security guards (respondents 6 to 74). The matter was heard by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras comprising Justice S.M. Subramaniam and Justice K. Rajasekar. The applicant was represented by Mr. Anand Gopalan for M/s. Agam Legal, and certain individual respondents were represented by Mr. K. Shanmugakani. The extracted text does not include the order or any reasoning of the court, and therefore the outcome of the review application, the issues considered, the arguments advanced, and the court’s decision are not available.

Issue of Consideration

REV.APPL.No.20 of 2025

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 33

REV.APPL.No.20 of 2025

2025-02-03

Justice S.M. Subramaniam, Justice K. Rajasekar

2025:MHC:524

Mr. Anand Gopalan (for Applicant), Mr. K. Shanmugakani (for certain respondents)

The Management of Ennore Thermal Power Station, Tamil Nadu Electricity Board, Ennore, Chennai – 600 0057

1. The Presiding Officer, Principal Labour Court, Chennai; 2. The Hindustan Security and Detective Services, 727, Ambal Building, Anna Salai, Chennai – 600 006; 3. The Southern Security Service, 50, 9th Street, Sourashtra Nagar, Choolaimedu High Road, Chennai – 600 094; 4. The Guardian Security Bureau Limited, 33, Nakker New Street, Madurai – 625 001; 5. The Security and Detective Bureau Limited, 17, Cathedral Garden Road, Chennai – 600 034; 6. S.Ravi; 7. K.Darnesan; 8. V. Chakkramoorthy; 9. M.Dasarathn; 10. D.Ramamoorthy; 11. G.Ravi; 12. S.Seshan; 13. S.R.Dhanapal; 14. T.E.Ekambaram; 15. M.Muthuraman; 16. D. Anbalagan; 17. P. Tamilarasan; 18. V.S. Mani; 19. C. Manmadan; 20. E. Ramalingam; 21. T. Gajapathy; 22. D. Veeran; 23. A.R. Nagappan; 24. M. Govindaraj; 25. N Ramesh; 26. V Elangovan; 27. P Dharmalingam; 28. V Rajan; 29. C M Palani; 30. S Desigamani; 31. S Tamizhselvan; 32. E Ramachandran; 33. S Murugesapandian; 34. V Doss; 35. V R Ravichandran; 36. M Devaraj; 37. A Sekara; 38. V Munuswamy; 39. M Munusamy; 40. M Thanushkodi; 41. K Dharman; 42. T V Nagarajan; 43. S Natarajan; 44. M Mustafa; 45. R Jayakumar; 46. R Ulaganathan; 47. R Mahalingam; 48. E Devan; 49. S Karthikeyan; 50. N Rathinam; 51. G Chokkalingam; 52. Y Gurudevan; 53. N Gopalakrishnan; 54. P Ravichandran; 55. V Prabakaran; 56. D Loganathan; 57. V R Madhavan; 58. N Ganesan; 59. L Murugesan; 60. R P Thulukkanam; 61. V Mayilvaganan; 62. R Chellaiah; 63. S Ramaiah; 64. M Selvam; 65. S Lakshmanan; 66. E Anandan; 67. K Dharman; 68. S Venu; 69. K Chandrasekar; 70. G Dayalan; 71. T Murugesan; 72. M Thulukkanam; 73. M Palani; 74. M Palaniswamy

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Review application seeking to review a Division Bench order in a writ appeal concerning a labour dispute.

Remedy Sought

Applicant (Management of Ennore Thermal Power Station) seeking review of the order dated 10.11.2023 in W.A.No.424 of 2021.

Previous Decisions

The order sought to be reviewed was passed in W.A.No.424 of 2021 on 10.11.2023 by a Division Bench. Details of the order are not provided in the extracted text.

Procedural History

The writ appeal W.A.No.424 of 2021 was decided by a Division Bench on 10.11.2023. The present review application No. 20 of 2025 was filed seeking review of that order. The matter was heard by the Division Bench of Justices S.M. Subramaniam and K. Rajasekar on 03.02.2025.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Order XLVII Rule 1, Section 114
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Madras Considers Review Application in Labour Dispute Over Security Guards' Employment Status. Application Filed Under Order XLVII Rule 1 CPC Against Division Bench Judgment in W.A.No.424 of 2021.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Section 498A IPC Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction based solely on three contradictory dying declarations cannot be sustained without corroboration.