Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Madras High Court Hears Claimant's Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act Seeking Enhancement of Compensation for Road Accident Injuries. Motorcyclist Suffered Grievous Injuries After Being Hit by Rashly Driven College Bus, Tribunal Award of Rs.8,96,000 Challenged as Inadequate.

High Court: Madras High Court Bench: Principal
Admin
2026-07-28 21:00:38
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and adequate, and whether enhancement is warranted

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • Section 173
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988 - appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal
  • compensation for motor accident
  • vicarious liability of owner and insurer
  • rash and negligent driving
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (02) 15

C.M.A.No.1915 of 2022

2025-02-19

J. Nisha Banu, R. Sakthivel

2025:MHC:474

P.L. Narayanan, R. Gokul for P.R. Umamaheswari, R. Rajesh

S.Balaraman

S.R.M.Institute of Science and Technology, The New India Assurance Company Limited

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal for compensation in road accident

Remedy Sought

Enhancement of compensation from Rs.8,96,000 awarded by Tribunal to Rs.35,00,000

Filing Reason

Claimant felt that the compensation granted for grievous injuries was insufficient

Previous Decisions

M.A.C.T.O.P.No.6593 of 2017 decided on 18.08.2021 by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub-Court No.2, Small Causes Court, Chennai) awarding Rs.8,96,000

Issues

Whether the accident occurred due to rash and negligent driving of the bus Whether the insurance company is liable to pay compensation Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is inadequate and requires enhancement

Submissions/Arguments

Claimant argued that the bus driver drove rashly and negligently causing the accident and grievous injuries, and respondents are vicariously liable. Insurance company denied involvement of bus, disputed liability on ground of lack of valid driving license, and contended compensation claimed is unsustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

the SRM College bus bearing Registration No. TN-19-AB-0823, driven in a rash and negligent manner in the same direction i.e., from east to west, dashed against him, on account of which, he had sustained grievous injury. Feeling aggrieved by the Award dated August 18, 2021 passed in M.A.C.T.O.P.No.6593 of 2017 on the file of 'Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (Special Sub-Court No.2, Motor Accident Claims Petition) Small Causes Court, Chennai' ... the appellant / claimant therein has preferred this Civil Miscellaneous Appeal.

Procedural History

Claim petition originally filed before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Chennai as M.A.C.T.O.P.No.6593 of 2017. The first respondent (owner of bus) was set ex-parte on 05.01.2018. The Tribunal passed an award on 18.08.2021 granting Rs.8,96,000 as compensation. Challenging the award, the claimant filed Civil Miscellaneous Appeal before Madras High Court under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 173
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
motor accident claim compensation enhancement Section 173 rash and negligent driving grievous injury vicarious liability insurance college bus motorcycle

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Hears Claimant's Appeal Under Section 173 of Motor Vehicles Act Seeking Enhancement of Compensation for Road Accident Injuries. Motorcyclist Suffered Grievous Injuries After Being Hit by Rashly Driven College Bus, Tribunal Award of ... 2026-07-28 21:00:38
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Cases — Market Value Determined at Rs. 1,50,000 per Hectare with Additional Benefits Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The court applied the belting method ... 2026-07-28 21:00:38
Categories
Popular Tags
Writ Petition acquittal natural justice Murder compensation burden of proof benefit of doubt limitation circumstantial evidence Article 226
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment Case — ...

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and La...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising Out of Use ...

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Disability A...

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Criminal Antec...

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Rajya Sabha Nomination Due ...

Supreme Court Allows Pension to Casual Labourers with Temporary Status in Department of Po...

Lost Your Password?