Supreme Court Directs Clarification on Unnatural Deaths in Prisons in PIL on Prison Conditions; Custodial Violence and Dignity Under Article 21 Reiterated. Classification of Prison Deaths by NCRB as Natural or Unnatural Found Ambiguous and Requires Explanation.

  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court, in a public interest litigation regarding inhuman conditions in 1382 prisons, addressed the issue of unnatural deaths of prisoners. The PIL was initiated after a letter from former Chief Justice R.C. Lahoti highlighting overcrowding, unnatural deaths, staff inadequacy, and lack of training was treated as a writ petition. In an earlier order dated 5th February 2016, the Court had issued directions concerning overcrowding. In the present stage of the proceedings, the Court considered the problem of unnatural deaths in prisons. The only available data was from the National Crime Records Bureau (NCRB), which showed that between 2012 and 2015, there were a significant number of deaths in judicial custody, with a small fraction classified as unnatural. The Amicus Curiae pointed out that the NCRB's classification of natural versus unnatural deaths was unclear, as deaths resulting from lack of proper or timely medical attention could arguably fall into either category. The Court agreed that the distinction needed explanation and indicated that it would address this issue. The judgment also reiterated that custodial violence, whether physical, psychological, or sexual, is abhorrent and violative of Article 21 of the Constitution, which guarantees the dignity of the individual. The Court emphasized that authorities must display greater sensitivity towards persons in custody. The order did not contain a final disposal of the issue but set the stage for further directions.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Fundamental Rights - Custodial Violence - Article 21, Constitution of India - The Court observed that custodial violence could manifest as psychological or sexual violence, and emphasized that the dignity of the individual is paramount; authorities must be sensitive to the vulnerable condition of prisoners. (Paras 1-2)

B) Prison Law - Unnatural Deaths in Custody - NCRB Death Classification - The Court noted that the NCRB's distinction between natural and unnatural deaths was ambiguous, especially in cases where lack of timely medical attention led to death, and required an explanation for the classification methodology. (Paras 6-7)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Unnatural deaths of prisoners and the need to clarify the National Crime Records Bureau's (NCRB) classification of natural and unnatural deaths in judicial custody.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Law Points

  • custodial violence
  • including psychological and sexual violence
  • is abhorrent
  • Article 21 guarantees dignity of individual
  • authorities must be sensitive to prisoners' rights
  • unnatural deaths in prisons must be addressed
  • NCRB classification of natural and unnatural deaths needs clarification
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (SC) (09) 112

Writ Petition (Civil) No. 406 of 2013 with I.A. No. 68248 of 2017

Madan B. Lokur, J.

Mr. Gaurav Agrawal (Amicus Curiae)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Public Interest Litigation (PIL) concerning inhuman conditions in 1382 prisons, including overcrowding, unnatural deaths, staff inadequacy, and lack of training.

Remedy Sought

The Court is considering measures to address unnatural deaths of prisoners and to clarify the NCRB's classification of deaths.

Filing Reason

A letter from former Chief Justice R.C. Lahoti highlighting these issues was treated as a PIL.

Previous Decisions

On 5th February 2016, the Court issued directions concerning overcrowding in prisons. Now it is considering the issue of unnatural deaths.

Issues

Unnatural deaths of prisoners Classification of natural and unnatural deaths by the NCRB Custodial violence including psychological and sexual violence

Submissions/Arguments

The Amicus Curiae pointed out that the NCRB's distinction between natural and unnatural deaths was unclear, particularly in cases where a prisoner died due to lack of proper or timely medical attention, and suggested that this needed explanation.

Judgment Excerpts

Custodial violence could take the form of third degree methods to extract information – the method used need not result in any physical violence but could be in the form of psychological violence. This message goes out loud and clear, as also the message that the dignity of the individual is not a plaything for those in authority. The distinction made by the NCRB between natural and unnatural deaths is unclear. For example, if a prisoner dies due to a lack of proper medical attention or timely medical attention, would that be classified as a natural death or an unnatural death? This needs to be explained as submitted by the learned Amicus.

Procedural History

PIL initiated by letter of former CJI Lahoti. On 5th February 2016, directions issued on overcrowding. Subsequently, the Court took up the issue of unnatural deaths in prisons.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 21
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Directs Clarification on Unnatural Deaths in Prisons in PIL on Prison Conditions; Custodial Violence and Dignity Under Article 21 Reiterated. Classification of Prison Deaths by NCRB as Natural or Unnatural Found Ambiguous and Requires E...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Abetment to Suicide. Conviction under Sections 498A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or instigation leading to suicide.