High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Internal Transfer Order in BBMP Service Matter — Transfer Held to Be an Administrative Decision Not Subject to Judicial Review Unless Mala Fides Proven. The petitioner, an Executive Engineer, failed to establish mala fides in his transfer from Deputy Director (Town Planning-South) to Chief Engineer (Lakes) under the BBMP.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 24
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Sri B.T. Mohan Krishna, an Executive Engineer in the Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike (BBMP), filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of internal transfer dated 06.09.2013. By the impugned order, he was transferred from his post of Deputy Director (Town Planning-South), Bangalore to the office of the Chief Engineer (Lakes), Bangalore. The petitioner contended that the transfer was not in public interest but was passed solely to accommodate respondent No.3, Sri T.P. Panchaksharaiah, by giving him a posting of his choice. The BBMP, in its statement of objections, submitted that the transfer was necessitated because respondent No.3 did not report for duty at the office to which he was posted and insisted on a particular posting. The court, after hearing the parties, observed that transfer is an incident of service and courts cannot interfere with transfer orders unless they are shown to be mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner failed to produce any material to establish mala fides on the part of the respondents. Consequently, the writ petition was dismissed. No order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Internal Transfer - Administrative Decision - The petitioner, an Executive Engineer in BBMP, challenged his internal transfer order dated 06.09.2013. The court held that transfer is an incident of service and courts cannot interfere with transfer orders unless they are mala fide or violate statutory rules. The petitioner failed to establish mala fides. (Paras 1-3)

B) Service Law - Transfer - Mala Fides - Burden of Proof - The petitioner alleged that the transfer was to favour respondent No.3. The BBMP stated that respondent No.3 did not report for duty and insisted on a particular posting. The court found no material to substantiate mala fides and dismissed the petition. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the impugned order of internal transfer of the petitioner from the post of Deputy Director (Town Planning-South) to the office of Chief Engineer (Lakes) is liable to be quashed on the ground that it was passed to favour respondent No.3.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Transfer is an incident of service
  • Courts cannot interfere with transfer orders unless mala fides or violation of statutory rules is established
  • Internal transfer within the same cadre does not require consent of employee
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (12) 8

Writ Petition No.41458/2013 (S-TR)

2013-12-12

H.G.Ramesh

Sri M.S.Bhagwat for petitioner; Sri Lohith S.R for Sri K.N. Putte Gowda for R1 & R2; Sri Subramanya Jois, Sr. Advocate for Sri K.C.Shantakumar for R3

Sri B.T. Mohan Krishna

Bruhath Bangalore Mahanagara Palike, The Additional Commissioner (Administration), Sri T.P. Panchaksharaiah

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging an internal transfer order in a municipal corporation service matter.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the transfer order dated 06.09.2013 transferring the petitioner from Deputy Director (Town Planning-South) to the office of Chief Engineer (Lakes).

Filing Reason

Petitioner alleged that the transfer was not in public interest but to favour respondent No.3.

Issues

Whether the impugned transfer order is mala fide and liable to be quashed. Whether courts can interfere with internal transfer orders in the absence of mala fides or violation of statutory rules.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the transfer was solely to accommodate respondent No.3 and was not in public interest. BBMP submitted that the transfer was necessitated because respondent No.3 did not report for duty and insisted on a particular posting.

Ratio Decidendi

Transfer is an incident of service. Courts cannot interfere with transfer orders unless they are shown to be mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner failed to establish mala fides.

Judgment Excerpts

Transfer is an incident of service. Courts cannot interfere with transfer orders unless they are shown to be mala fide or in violation of statutory rules. The petitioner has not produced any material to establish mala fides on the part of the respondents.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed on an unspecified date and came up for preliminary hearing in 'B' Group before the High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore on 12.12.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Father in Son's Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as motive, last seen, and extra-judicial confession formed complete chain of circumstances.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Internal Transfer Order in BBMP Service Matter — Transfer Held to Be an Administrative Decision Not Subject to Judicial Review Unless Mala Fides Proven. The petitioner, an Executive Engine...