High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued to Brother-in-Law, Reduces Sentence to Fine and Compensation. Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan for Business Purpose, Defence of Issuance to Prevent Harassment of Sister Not Believed.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Prosecution
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner/accused, Smt. Shobhavathi, issued a cheque for Rs.50,000 to the respondent/complainant, Dr. Krishnoji Rao, who is her brother-in-law. The cheque was dishonoured, leading to a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. The complainant alleged that the cheque was issued towards repayment of a loan taken for business purposes. The accused contended that the cheque was issued without consideration, to prevent the complainant from harassing his third wife, who is the accused's sister. The Trial Court convicted the accused, and the Appellate Court confirmed the conviction, reducing the sentence to one month simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs.1,00,000. The accused filed a revision petition. The High Court held that the presumption of consideration under Section 139 NI Act applies, and the accused failed to rebut it. The court noted that the accused's defence was not supported by evidence, as she did not examine her sister or produce any complaint of harassment. The court upheld the conviction but modified the sentence, setting aside the imprisonment and imposing a fine of Rs.1,00,000, with default simple imprisonment for one month, and directing that the fine be paid as compensation to the complainant.

Headnote

A) Negotiable Instruments Act - Dishonour of Cheque - Section 138 - Presumption of Consideration - The court considered whether the cheque issued by the accused to the complainant, her brother-in-law, was supported by lawful consideration. The accused contended the cheque was issued to prevent harassment of her sister, the complainant's third wife. The court held that the presumption under Section 139 of the NI Act applies and the accused failed to rebut it on a preponderance of probabilities. The conviction was upheld. (Paras 1-3)

B) Negotiable Instruments Act - Sentence - Section 138 - The appellate court had reduced the sentence to one month simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs.1,00,000. The High Court, in revision, modified the sentence to fine of Rs.1,00,000 and in default simple imprisonment for one month, while confirming the compensation. (Para 3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the cheque was issued for a lawful consideration and whether the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 is sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Revision petition dismissed. Conviction under Section 138 NI Act upheld. Sentence modified: imprisonment set aside, fine of Rs.1,00,000 imposed, in default simple imprisonment for one month. Fine to be paid as compensation to complainant.

Law Points

  • Presumption of consideration under Section 139 NI Act
  • Burden of proof on accused to rebut presumption
  • Standard of proof for rebuttal is preponderance of probabilities
  • Sentence discretion under Section 138 NI Act
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2013 LawText (KAR) (03) 3

Crl.R.P.No.1585 OF 2004

2013-03-12

K. Sreedhar Rao

K.V. Narasimhan (for petitioner), S. Subhash (for respondent)

Smt. Shobhavathi

Dr. Krishnoji Rao

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal revision petition against conviction under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 for cheque dishonour.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner/accused sought to set aside conviction and sentence imposed by Trial Court and confirmed by Appellate Court.

Filing Reason

Cheque issued by accused to complainant was dishonoured; complaint filed under Section 138 NI Act.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court convicted accused; Appellate Court confirmed conviction and reduced sentence to one month simple imprisonment and compensation of Rs.1,00,000.

Issues

Whether the cheque was issued for a lawful consideration? Whether the conviction under Section 138 NI Act is sustainable? Whether the sentence imposed is appropriate?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that cheque was issued to prevent harassment of her sister (complainant's third wife) and not for any lawful consideration. Petitioner argued that sentence of imprisonment is bad in law. Respondent argued that cheque was issued for repayment of loan for business purpose.

Ratio Decidendi

The presumption under Section 139 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 that a cheque is issued for consideration applies. The accused failed to rebut this presumption on a preponderance of probabilities. The defence that the cheque was issued to prevent harassment of the accused's sister was not supported by evidence. Therefore, the conviction under Section 138 NI Act is sustainable.

Judgment Excerpts

The petitioner/accused had issued a cheque for a sum of Rs.50,000/- in favour of the complainant, who is none other her brother-in-law. The Trial Court has held the accused guilty of committing offence U/s.138 of N.I. Act. The Appellate Court confirmed the conviction and modified the sentence reducing S.I. for a period of one month and compensation of Rs.1.00 lakh and directed to pay the same to the respondent.

Procedural History

Complaint filed in JMFC-II Court, Mysore (C.C.No.2180/99) resulting in conviction on 1.8.03. Appeal to Fast Track Court-II, Mysore (Crl.A.No.110/03) confirmed conviction and modified sentence on 8.10.04. Revision filed in High Court of Karnataka (Crl.R.P.No.1585/2004) decided on 12.3.2013.

Acts & Sections

  • Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881: 138, 139
  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973: 397
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Grants Bail to Employee in Cyber Fraud Case Due to Long Incarceration and No Trial Progress. The court held that one year of custody and lack of charge framing constituted a change in circumstances warranting bail under Section 483...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 138 NI Act for Dishonour of Cheque Issued to Brother-in-Law, Reduces Sentence to Fine and Compensation. Cheque Issued for Repayment of Loan for Business Purpose, Defence of Issuance to Prevent ...