High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Decree in Partition Suit; Holds Second Wife in Void Marriage Not an Heir. Marriage Contracted During Subsistence of First Marriage Confers No Succession Rights Under Section 10 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The High Court of Karnataka, Circuit Bench at Gulbarga, heard a revision petition against a trial court decree in a partition suit. The plaintiff, claiming to be the widow of one Ningappa, sought half share in the deceased's property. The defendant contended that the plaintiff was the second wife, her marriage being void as it was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage. The trial court decreed the suit in favour of the plaintiff. Aggrieved, the defendant filed a revision petition before the High Court. The core legal question was whether a second wife in a void marriage under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, is entitled to succeed to her husband's property under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The court analyzed the provisions of Section 5 and 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, which declare a marriage performed while either party has a living spouse to be null and void. It also examined Section 10 of the Hindu Succession Act governing distribution among Class I heirs, which includes the widow, and the Schedule of Class I heirs. The court held that the term 'widow' in the Succession Act must be interpreted in harmony with the Marriage Act, and only a legally wedded wife whose marriage is valid can claim that status. The second wife, being in a void marriage, is not an heir and has no right to the property. The court emphasized that allowing such a claim would defeat the object of prohibiting bigamy and nullify the penal consequences under Sections 494 and 495 IPC. The trial court's decree was set aside as perverse and contrary to law. The revision petition was allowed, and the suit was dismissed on the ground that the plaint itself disclosed no cause of action.

Headnote

A) Hindu Law - Marriage - Validity of Second Marriage - Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Sections 5(i), 11 - The marriage of a woman as a second wife during the subsistence of the husband's first marriage is null and void ab initio - Held that such a marriage does not confer the status of 'wife'; consequently, she does not become a 'widow' upon the husband's death and has no inheritance rights under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956 (Paras 19-21).

B) Succession - Intestate Succession - Share of Widow - Hindu Succession Act, 1956, Section 10, Class I heirs - The expression 'widow' in Section 10 refers only to a legally wedded wife - A woman in a void marriage is not an heir in Class I and cannot claim any share in the deceased husband's property - Held that the plaintiff, being a second wife, is not a 'widow' and has no right to seek partition (Paras 19-22).

C) Interpretation of Statutes - Harmonious Construction - Interplay between Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 and Hindu Succession Act, 1956 - The legislative intent behind the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, to prohibit bigamy and declare such marriages void under Section 11 must be respected; extending succession rights to a second wife would undermine the penal provisions of Sections 494 and 495 of the Indian Penal Code - Held that Parliament did not intend to confer any property right on a party to a bigamous marriage (Paras 19-21).

D) Civil Procedure - Pleadings - Rejection of Plaint - Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, Order VII Rule 11 - Where the plaint averments themselves show no cause of action, the suit is liable to be rejected - The trial court's decree was perverse and against binding High Court precedent; the approach showed disregard for statutory provisions and rule of law - Held that the suit is dismissed as the plaint does not disclose a cause of action (Paras 21-22).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a second wife whose marriage is void under Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, can be considered a widow and an heir under Section 10 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956?

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The revision petition was allowed; the impugned order of the trial court was set aside; the plaintiff's suit was dismissed as the plaint did not disclose a cause of action.

Law Points

  • marriage void under Section 5 and 11
  • Hindu Marriage Act
  • 1955
  • second wife not a widow
  • not entitled to succession under Section 10 Hindu Succession Act
  • 1956
  • bigamy is an offence
  • harmonious construction of Acts
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (KAR) (01) 34

N. Kumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil suit for partition and separate possession of property of deceased husband.

Remedy Sought

Plaintiff (second wife) sought half share in the properties of deceased Ningappa.

Filing Reason

Claim of inheritance as a widow under Section 10 of the Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

Previous Decisions

Trial Court decreed the suit in favour of plaintiff; defendant filed revision petition before High Court.

Issues

Whether a second wife whose marriage is null and void under Section 5 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, can be considered a widow and is entitled to inherit the property of her deceased husband as a Class I heir under the Hindu Succession Act, 1956?

Submissions/Arguments

Plaintiff claimed to be the legally wedded wife of the deceased and entitled to half share in his property as a widow. Defendant contended that the plaintiff was the second wife, the marriage being void as it was contracted during the subsistence of the first marriage, and therefore she is not a widow and has no right to inherit.

Ratio Decidendi

A marriage contracted during the subsistence of a previous marriage is null and void under Section 5(i) and Section 11 of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955. The second wife does not acquire the status of a 'widow' and is not an heir in Class I of the Schedule to the Hindu Succession Act, 1956. The term 'widow' in Section 10 of the Succession Act must be read in harmony with the Marriage Act, and only a legally wedded wife can claim inheritance. Granting succession rights to a second wife would defeat the object of the Hindu Marriage Act and the penal provisions of Sections 494 and 495 IPC.

Judgment Excerpts

Her marriage with deceased Ningappa was null and void. She did not get the status of a wife. Therefore, she did not get the status of a widow so as to get the benefit under Section 10 of the Act. The revision petition is allowed. The impugned order is hereby set aside. The suit of the plaintiff is dismissed, as the averments in the plaint do not disclose the cause of action. Plaint is rejected.

Procedural History

Plaintiff filed suit for partition and separate possession. Defendant filed written statement contesting the claim based on void marriage. Trial court decreed the suit. Defendant filed a civil revision petition before the High Court. High Court allowed the revision and dismissed the suit.

Acts & Sections

  • Hindu Marriage Act, 1955: Section 5, Section 11, Section 16
  • Hindu Succession Act, 1956: Section 10
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: Section 494, Section 495
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Trial Court Decree in Partition Suit; Holds Second Wife in Void Marriage Not an Heir. Marriage Contracted During Subsistence of First Marriage Confers No Succession Rights Under Section 10 of Hindu Succession Act, 1...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Grants Anticipatory Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case - No Prima Facie Case of Abetment to Suicide. Court Held That Mere Registration of FIR Under Atrocities Act Does Not Attract Bar Under Section 18 if Essential Ingredients Are Mis...