High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Income Assessment. Tribunal's assessment of monthly income at Rs.15,000/- for a priest without documentary evidence held excessive; notional income of Rs.6,000/- per month applied under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 31
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation against the judgment and award dated 26.07.2011 passed by the 14th Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Bengaluru City (SCCH.10) in MVC No.3227/2010. The Tribunal had awarded a compensation of Rs.23,94,154/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till payment to the claimants, who are the wife and sons of the deceased Laxmanachar Joshi, who died in a road traffic accident. The claimants had sought Rs.40,00,000/-. The appellant-Corporation contended that the award was on the higher side and disproportionate to the income of the deceased. The facts are that the deceased was a priest aged about 55 years. The Tribunal assessed his monthly income at Rs.15,000/- based on the evidence of the claimants. The High Court found that the claimants did not produce any documentary evidence to prove the income of the deceased. Therefore, the court assessed the notional income at Rs.6,000/- per month. After deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses and applying a multiplier of 11 (as per Sarla Verma case), the loss of dependency was calculated at Rs.5,28,000/-. The court also awarded Rs.10,000/- towards loss of consortium, Rs.5,000/- towards loss of estate, and Rs.5,000/- towards funeral expenses. Thus, the total compensation was reduced to Rs.5,48,000/-. The appeal was allowed in part, reducing the compensation from Rs.23,94,154/- to Rs.5,48,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till payment.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Compensation - Quantum - Appeal against award - Deceased was a priest aged 55 years - Claimants claimed Rs.40,00,000/- - Tribunal awarded Rs.23,94,154/- - Appellant-Corporation contended award is excessive - Held that Tribunal erred in taking monthly income as Rs.15,000/- without proper proof - Income assessed at Rs.6,000/- per month - After deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses and applying multiplier of 11, loss of dependency reduced - Compensation reduced to Rs.5,28,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is excessive and requires reduction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed in part. Compensation reduced from Rs.23,94,154/- to Rs.5,48,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till payment.

Law Points

  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 173(1)
  • Compensation for death
  • Multiplier method
  • Income proof
  • Future prospects
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (03) 17

M.F.A. No. 11966 of 2011 (MV)

2014-03-24

N.K. Patil, Pradeep D. Waingankar

Sri. D. Vijaya Kumar (for appellant), Sri. Narendra Gowda (for respondents)

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation

Sri. Narasubai Joshi @ N.L. Joshi, Sri. Maruthi Joshi, Sri. Badrinatha Joshi

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Reduction of compensation awarded by Tribunal

Filing Reason

Appellant-Corporation contended that the compensation of Rs.23,94,154/- awarded by the Tribunal was excessive and disproportionate to the income of the deceased

Previous Decisions

Tribunal awarded Rs.23,94,154/- with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No.3227/2010

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in assessing the monthly income of the deceased at Rs.15,000/- without proper proof? Whether the compensation awarded is excessive and requires reduction?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the income of the deceased was not proved by documentary evidence and the award is on higher side. Respondents supported the Tribunal's award.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of documentary evidence of income, the court may assess notional income. For a priest aged 55 years, notional income of Rs.6,000/- per month is reasonable. After deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses and applying multiplier of 11, loss of dependency is Rs.5,28,000/-. Additional conventional damages of Rs.20,000/- awarded.

Judgment Excerpts

The claimants have not produced any documentary evidence to prove the income of the deceased. Therefore, we deem it fit to assess the notional income of the deceased at Rs.6,000/- per month. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed in part.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MVC No.3227/2010 before the 14th Additional Judge, Court of Small Causes and MACT, Bengaluru City, which awarded Rs.23,94,154/- on 26.07.2011. The appellant-Corporation filed MFA No.11966/2011 before the High Court challenging the award.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Reduces Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Income Assessment. Tribunal's assessment of monthly income at Rs.15,000/- for a priest without documentary evidence held excessive; notional income of Rs.6,000/- pe...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Perjury Case for Turning Hostile in Murder Trial — Summary Trial Under Section 344 CrPC Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. The court held that the trial court failed to provide the appell...