High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Election Commission Order in Cooperative Society Election Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Statutory Rules or Natural Justice. The court held that the order postponing the election of Prathmika Krushi Pattina Sahakar Sangh, Devikoppa, passed by the Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission, did not warrant interference under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners, eight individuals who are members of the Prathmika Krushi Pattina Sahakar Sangh, Devikoppa, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench. They sought to quash an order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission (respondent No.1) which postponed the election of the said cooperative society. The petitioners contended that the order was arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violated the provisions of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 and the Rules framed thereunder. They argued that the Election Commission had no power to postpone the election and that the order was passed without giving them an opportunity of being heard. The respondents, including the Cooperative Election Commission, the District Cooperative Election Commissioner, the Returning Officer, and the Society, opposed the petitions. The court, after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned High Court Government Pleader for respondents 1 and 2, observed that the petitioners had not placed any material on record to demonstrate that the impugned order suffered from any legal infirmity or that it was passed in violation of any statutory provisions or principles of natural justice. The court noted that the writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 is not meant to correct every error but to prevent miscarriage of justice or violation of fundamental rights. Since the petitioners failed to establish any such ground, the court found no merit in the petitions and dismissed them. The court did not award any costs.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Writ Jurisdiction - Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India - Scope of Judicial Review - Petitioners challenged order of Cooperative Election Commission postponing election - Court held that writ jurisdiction is not meant to correct every error but to prevent miscarriage of justice or violation of fundamental rights - Petitioners failed to show any violation of statutory rules or principles of natural justice - Held that no interference is warranted (Paras 1-3).

B) Cooperative Law - Election Process - Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 and Karnataka Cooperative Societies Rules, 1960 - Power of Election Commission to postpone elections - The Cooperative Election Commission passed order dated 10.12.2013 postponing election of Prathmika Krushi Pattina Sahakar Sangh, Devikoppa - Petitioners alleged order was arbitrary and without jurisdiction - Court found no material to suggest that the Commission acted beyond its powers or in violation of any statutory provision - Held that the order does not suffer from any legal infirmity (Paras 2-3).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission postponing the election of the Prathmika Krushi Pattina Sahakar Sangh, Devikoppa, is liable to be quashed in writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, dismissed the writ petitions, holding that the petitioners failed to establish any legal infirmity or violation of statutory provisions or principles of natural justice in the impugned order. No costs were awarded.

Law Points

  • Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India
  • Cooperative societies election
  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act
  • 1959
  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Rules
  • 1960
  • Election Commission's power to postpone elections
  • Natural justice
  • Alternative remedy
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (KAR) (01) 35

Writ Petition Nos.100765-769/2014 & Writ Petition Nos.100802-804/2014 (CS)

2014-01-29

Aravind Kumar

Anoop G. Deshpande for petitioners, K.S. Patil, HCGP for respondents 1 and 2

Shankarappa S/o. Mallappa Kelageri and others

The Cooperative Election Commission, Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission and others

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission postponing the election of a cooperative society.

Remedy Sought

Petitioners sought a writ of certiorari quashing the order dated 10.12.2013 passed by respondent No.1 (Cooperative Election Commission).

Filing Reason

Petitioners alleged that the order postponing the election was arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and violated the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act and Rules.

Issues

Whether the order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission postponing the election of the Prathmika Krushi Pattina Sahakar Sangh, Devikoppa, is liable to be quashed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners argued that the impugned order was arbitrary, without jurisdiction, and passed in violation of the Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959 and Rules, 1960. Respondents opposed the petitions, contending that the order was valid and within the powers of the Election Commission.

Ratio Decidendi

Writ jurisdiction under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is not meant to correct every error but to prevent miscarriage of justice or violation of fundamental rights. The petitioners failed to show any violation of statutory rules or principles of natural justice, and therefore, no interference with the order of the Cooperative Election Commission was warranted.

Judgment Excerpts

Petitioners have sought for the following relief: 'Issue a writ or order or direction in the nature of writ of certiorari by quashing order dated 10.12.2013 bearing No. ... at Annexure-B passed by the Respondent No.1.' Heard, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners and the learned HCGP for respondents 1 and 2.

Procedural History

The petitioners filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, challenging an order dated 10.12.2013 passed by the Karnataka State Cooperative Election Commission. The petitions came up for preliminary hearing on 29.01.2014, and the court dismissed them.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Articles 226, 227
  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Act, 1959:
  • Karnataka Cooperative Societies Rules, 1960:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Cooperative Election Commission Order in Cooperative Society Election Dispute — Petitioners Failed to Establish Violation of Statutory Rules or Natural Justice. The court held that the or...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Application Under Section 195-A Cr.P.C. for Inquiry into Alleged Fabrication of Evidence by Police Officers. The court held that the trial court must conduct a preliminary inquiry before reje...