Bombay High Court Allows Construction of 132 KV Transmission Line Through Mangrove Areas Subject to Conditions. Petitioner Granted Permission to Proceed with 80 km Line in Thane District, Subject to Compliance with Environmental Safeguards and Payment of Compensatory Afforestation Charges.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition seeking permission from the Bombay High Court to construct a 132 KV double circuit transmission line from Dahanu Substation to Suryanagar Substation and Kavdas Substation in Thane District, covering approximately 80 kilometers. The line passes through mangrove forest lands, reserved forests, private forests, protected forests, and portions within Dahanu and Jawhar forest divisions in Palghar District. The petition was necessitated by the requirement of prior court permission for any construction activity within 50 meters of mangroves, as per the judgment dated 17th September 2018 in Public Interest Litigation No. 87 of 2006 (Bombay Environmental Group vs. State of Maharashtra). The Petitioner pleaded that although government records show the area as mangrove, site inspection revealed open lands with no live mangroves. The Deputy Conservator of Forests directed the Petitioner to obtain court permission. The Petitioner obtained all statutory permissions, including CRZ clearance from MCZMA, and deposited Rs. 30,80,61,242/- in the CAMPA account for compensatory afforestation. The Court, after hearing the Advocate General for the Petitioner and counsels for the respondents, granted permission subject to conditions: no construction in actual mangrove areas, use of existing forest roads and paths, no felling of mangroves, restoration of temporary access roads, and submission of a compliance report to MCZMA and the Mangrove Cell. The Court also directed that the CAMPA deposit be utilized for mangrove conservation and restoration. The petition was disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Mangrove Protection - Prior Court Permission - Requirement of prior permission of the High Court for any construction activity within 50 meters of mangroves, as per the judgment dated 17th September 2018 in PIL No. 87 of 2006 (Bombay Environmental Group vs. State of Maharashtra) - The Petitioner sought permission to construct a 132 KV transmission line of approximately 80 km, part of which passes through mangrove areas in Palghar District - The Court granted permission subject to conditions including no construction in actual mangrove areas, use of existing forest roads, and deposit of compensatory afforestation charges (Paras 1-6).

B) Environmental Law - Compensatory Afforestation - CAMPA - The Petitioner deposited Rs. 30,80,61,242/- in the CAMPA account towards compensatory afforestation charges as required under the Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980 - The Court noted that the deposit was made and directed that the amount be utilized for mangrove conservation and restoration (Para 4).

C) Environmental Law - Coastal Regulation Zone (CRZ) - Compliance with CRZ Notifications - The Petitioner obtained CRZ clearance from the Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority (MCZMA) - The Court directed that the construction shall be in compliance with the CRZ Notification, 2019 and the conditions imposed by MCZMA (Para 5).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Petitioner can be permitted to construct a 132 KV transmission line passing through mangrove forest lands, reserved forests, and other protected areas, given the requirement of prior court permission under the judgment in Public Interest Litigation No. 87 of 2006.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court granted permission to the Petitioner to undertake the construction of the 132 KV transmission line subject to conditions: (i) no construction in actual mangrove areas; (ii) use of existing forest roads and paths; (iii) no felling of mangroves; (iv) restoration of temporary access roads; (v) compliance with CRZ Notification, 2019 and MCZMA conditions; (vi) submission of compliance report to MCZMA and Mangrove Cell; (vii) the CAMPA deposit of Rs. 30,80,61,242/- to be utilized for mangrove conservation and restoration. The petition was disposed of.

Law Points

  • Prior permission of court required for construction within 50 meters of mangroves
  • Compensatory afforestation charges deposited in CAMPA account
  • Compliance with CRZ notifications
  • No construction in actual mangrove areas
  • Use of existing forest roads and paths
  • No felling of mangroves
  • Restoration of temporary access roads
  • Submission of compliance report to MCZMA and Mangrove Cell.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (07) 78

Writ Petition No. 13405 of 2023

2026-07-21

Ravindra V. Ghuge, ACJ., Gautam A. Ankhad, J.

Mr. Milind Sathe, Advocate General a/w Mr. S.D. Shetty, Mr. Rakesh Singh, Mr. Aditya, Mr. Ashitosh i/b M.V. Kini & Co. for the Petitioner; Mr. Rovie Bandekar with Ms. Sheetal Shah, Ms. JayaBajwe, Ms. Shruti Parab for Respondent No.4-MCZMA; Mrs. Neha S. Bhide, GP with Mr. O.A. Chandurkar, AGP, Mrs. Sunita Prabhune, AGP, Ms Leena Patil for the Respondent-State.

Maharashtra State Electricity Transmission Co. Ltd.

The State of Maharashtra, Union of India, Bombay Environmental Action Group, Maharashtra Coastal Zone Management Authority, Mangrove Cell, Mumbai

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition seeking prior permission of the High Court for construction of a 132 KV transmission line passing through mangrove areas and forests.

Remedy Sought

Permission to undertake construction of the proposed transmission line.

Filing Reason

Requirement of prior court permission for any construction activity within 50 meters of mangroves as per the judgment in PIL No. 87 of 2006.

Previous Decisions

Judgment dated 17th September 2018 in Public Interest Litigation No. 87 of 2006 (Bombay Environmental Group vs. State of Maharashtra) requiring prior court permission for construction within 50 meters of mangroves.

Issues

Whether the Petitioner can be permitted to construct a 132 KV transmission line through mangrove areas and forests. Whether the conditions imposed by the Court are adequate to protect the environment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner submitted that all statutory permissions have been obtained and compensatory afforestation charges deposited. Petitioner argued that site inspection revealed no live mangroves in the area, though government records show mangrove classification.

Ratio Decidendi

The Court held that prior permission is required for construction within 50 meters of mangroves, and such permission can be granted subject to conditions ensuring no damage to mangroves and compliance with environmental laws. The deposit of compensatory afforestation charges and adherence to CRZ norms are essential safeguards.

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioner seeks permission of this Court to undertake the proposed construction of 132 KV D/C line from Dahanu Substation to 132 KV Suryanagar Substation and Kavdas Substation... The Petitioner has pleaded that although the part of the land is shown as mangrove area in the Government records, site inspection revealed that these portions are open lands where no live mangroves exist. Dr. Milind Sathe, learned Advocate General appearing for the Petitioner, submits that all statutory permissions required for the construction of the transmission line has been obtained. The Petitioner has deposited the necessary charges totaling to Rs. 30,80,61,242/- in the CAMPA account on 1st July 2026.

Procedural History

The Petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 13405 of 2023 before the Bombay High Court seeking permission to construct a 132 KV transmission line. The petition was reserved on 14th July 2026 and pronounced on 21st July 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Forest (Conservation) Act, 1980:
  • Coastal Regulation Zone Notification, 2019:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Probate Suit for Alleged Will of 1975 Due to Non-Prosecution and Failure to Prove Execution. The court held that the propounder must prove due execution and attestation under Section 63 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, ...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Transfer Pricing Case Due to Non-Application of Mind by ITAT. Tribunal's order set aside for failing to consider the TPO's detailed analysis and rejecting comparables without proper reasoning under Section...