High Court of Karnataka Upholds Validity of Central Government Notification Under NDPS Act in Reference Under Section 395 Cr.P.C. — Notification Dated 18.11.2009 Under Section 36A(1)(b) of NDPS Act, 1985 Empowering Special Judge to Take Cognizance Without Committal Is Valid, and Bail Granted to Accused Under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 166
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case is a Criminal Referred Case under Section 395 Cr.P.C. arising from an order dated 26.5.2010 passed by the Special Judge (NDPS), Bengaluru, in Crime No.52/2010. The Special Judge referred the matter to the High Court to examine the validity of the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act). The notification empowers the Special Judge to take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed to him for trial. The accused persons (A. Shahid, Parveez Ahmed, and Syed Rakbathulla Omer) had filed bail applications under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. The High Court, after hearing the Registrar General (petitioner) and the accused (respondents), held that the notification is valid and not ultra vires. Consequently, the High Court granted bail to the accused on certain conditions, including furnishing a bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with sureties, and directed them to appear before the Special Judge as required.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure Code - Reference under Section 395 Cr.P.C. - Validity of Notification - The Special Judge (NDPS) referred the matter to the High Court under Section 395 Cr.P.C. to examine the validity of the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985, which empowers the Special Judge to take cognizance of offences without committal. The High Court held that the notification is valid and not ultra vires. (Paras 1-10)

B) Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Section 36A(1)(b) - Cognizance without Committal - The notification under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 empowers the Special Judge to take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed to him for trial. The High Court held that the notification is valid and the Special Judge can take cognizance directly. (Paras 5-10)

C) Criminal Procedure Code - Section 167(2) - Bail - The accused persons filed bail applications under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. and Section 439 Cr.P.C. The High Court, after upholding the validity of the notification, granted bail to the accused on certain conditions. (Paras 10-12)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 is valid and whether the Special Judge (NDPS) can take cognizance of offences without committal by a Magistrate.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court held that the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 is valid and not ultra vires. Consequently, the High Court granted bail to the accused persons (A. Shahid, Parveez Ahmed, and Syed Rakbathulla Omer) on certain conditions, including furnishing a bond of Rs.1,00,000/- each with sureties, and directed them to appear before the Special Judge as required.

Law Points

  • Validity of Central Government notification under Section 36A(1)(b) of NDPS Act
  • 1985
  • Section 395 Cr.P.C. reference
  • Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. bail
  • Special Judge jurisdiction
  • Cognizance without committal
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (10) 10

Criminal Referred Case No.1/2010

2015-10-06

Mohan M. Shantanagoudar, Budihal R.B.

Sri. S. Jayakara Shetty (Central Government Standing Counsel), Sri. C.H. Jadhav (Senior Counsel as Amicus Curiae), Sri. Hashmath Pasha (for respondents)

The Registrar General, High Court of Karnataka

A. Shahid, Parveez Ahmed, Syed Rakbathulla Omer

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Reference under Section 395 Cr.P.C. by the Special Judge (NDPS) to the High Court to examine the validity of a Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985.

Remedy Sought

The Special Judge sought a ruling on the validity of the notification to decide bail applications filed by accused persons under Section 439 Cr.P.C. and Section 167(2) Cr.P.C.

Filing Reason

The Special Judge was uncertain about the validity of the notification and referred the matter to the High Court under Section 395 Cr.P.C.

Previous Decisions

The Special Judge passed an order dated 26.5.2010 referring the matter to the High Court.

Issues

Whether the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 is valid. Whether the Special Judge (NDPS) can take cognizance of offences without committal by a Magistrate.

Submissions/Arguments

The Registrar General submitted that the notification is valid and the Special Judge can take cognizance without committal. The accused argued that the notification is ultra vires and the Special Judge cannot take cognizance without committal.

Ratio Decidendi

The Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009 issued under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 is valid and empowers the Special Judge to take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed to him for trial. The notification is not ultra vires.

Judgment Excerpts

The Special Judge (NDPS), Bengaluru by his order dated 26.5.2010 in Crime No.52/2010, referred the matter to this Court under Section 395 Cr.P.C. to examine the validity of the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009. The notification under Section 36A(1)(b) of the NDPS Act, 1985 empowers the Special Judge to take cognizance of offences without the accused being committed to him for trial. We hold that the notification is valid and not ultra vires.

Procedural History

The Special Judge (NDPS), Bengaluru, passed an order dated 26.5.2010 in Crime No.52/2010 referring the matter to the High Court under Section 395 Cr.P.C. to examine the validity of the Central Government Gazette Notification dated 18.11.2009. The High Court registered the case as Criminal Referred Case No.1/2010 vide order dated 9.6.2010 of the Hon'ble Chief Justice. The matter was heard and decided on 6.10.2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.): 395, 167(2), 439
  • Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act): 36A(1)(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Cruelty by Husband — Throttling Wife to Death in Presence of Children. Evidence of Eyewitnesses and Medical Reports Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Salary Arrears Claim by Former Law College Vice-Principal. The court examined State Government's liability for back wages arising from an appointment allegedly made without following mand...