High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by KSFC Against Interim Order to Handover Possession of Seized Assets — Writ Appeal Maintainable Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Against Interim Order in Writ Petition

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Branch Manager of Karnataka State Financial Corporation (KSFC), appealed against an interim order dated 12.05.2015 passed by a learned Single Judge in W.P.No.103642/2015. The respondent, M/s. Gayathri Agro Products, a partnership firm, had filed the writ petition seeking to quash an order dated 18.03.2015 (Annexure-E) and for a mandamus directing the appellant to handover possession of the assets of M/s. Kotturu Basaveshwara Industries of Karatagi. The learned Single Judge, while entertaining the writ petition, passed an interim order directing the appellant to handover possession of the assets. Aggrieved, the appellant filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The Division Bench, after hearing both sides, noted that the writ petition was still pending and that the interim order effectively granted the final relief sought in the writ petition. The court held that such an interim order could not be sustained as it would render the writ petition infructuous. Accordingly, the appeal was allowed, the interim order dated 12.05.2015 was set aside, and the learned Single Judge was requested to dispose of the writ petition expeditiously. The court also directed that the parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the assets of M/s. Kotturu Basaveshwara Industries until the disposal of the writ petition.

Headnote

A) Writ Law - Maintainability of Appeal - Interim Order - Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 - The court considered whether a writ appeal lies against an interim order passed by a learned Single Judge in a writ petition. The Division Bench held that the appeal is maintainable and proceeded to hear the matter on merits, setting aside the interim order as the writ petition itself was pending and the interim direction effectively granted the final relief sought. (Paras 1-5)

B) Financial Corporation - Possession of Assets - Interim Relief - State Financial Corporations Act, 1951 - The respondent sought quashing of an order dated 18.03.2015 and mandamus for handover of possession of assets of M/s. Kotturu Basaveshwara Industries. The learned Single Judge passed an interim order directing the appellant/KSFC to handover possession. The Division Bench set aside the interim order, holding that granting such interim relief would amount to allowing the writ petition itself at the interim stage. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 is maintainable against an interim order passed by a learned Single Judge in a writ petition directing the appellant to handover possession of assets.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The appeal is allowed. The interim order dated 12.05.2015 passed in W.P.No.103642/2015 is set aside. The learned Single Judge is requested to dispose of the writ petition as expeditiously as possible. The parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the assets of M/s. Kotturu Basaveshwara Industries until the disposal of the writ petition.

Law Points

  • Maintainability of writ appeal against interim order
  • Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act
  • 1961
  • Interim relief in writ petition
  • Possession of assets by financial corporation
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (05) 1

Writ Appeal No.1546/2015 (GM-KSFC)

2015-05-21

A.N. Venugopala Gowda, B. Veerappa

Sri Veeresh R. Budihal (for appellant), Sri V.M. Sheelvant (for respondent)

The Branch Manager, The Karnataka State Financial Corporation

M/s. Gayathri Agro Products, a Partnership Firm represented by its Partner Amaresh S. Patil

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeal against an interim order passed by a learned Single Judge in a writ petition directing the appellant to handover possession of assets.

Remedy Sought

The appellant sought setting aside of the interim order dated 12.05.2015 passed in W.P.No.103642/2015.

Filing Reason

The respondent filed a writ petition to quash an order dated 18.03.2015 and for a mandamus to handover possession of assets of M/s. Kotturu Basaveshwara Industries. The learned Single Judge passed an interim order directing the appellant to handover possession.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge passed an interim order on 12.05.2015 in W.P.No.103642/2015 directing the appellant to handover possession of the assets.

Issues

Whether the writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 is maintainable against an interim order in a writ petition. Whether the interim order directing handover of possession was sustainable when the writ petition was still pending.

Submissions/Arguments

The appellant argued that the interim order effectively granted the final relief sought in the writ petition and could not be sustained. The respondent contended that the interim order was justified and should be upheld.

Ratio Decidendi

An interim order that effectively grants the final relief sought in a writ petition cannot be sustained, as it would render the writ petition infructuous. Such an order should be set aside, and the writ petition should be disposed of expeditiously with a direction to maintain status quo.

Judgment Excerpts

Though this appeal is listed today for preliminary hearing, with the consent of learned Advocates on both sides, is taken up for final hearing. The interim order dated 12.05.2015 passed in W.P.No.103642/2015 is set aside. The parties shall maintain status quo in respect of the assets of M/s. Kotturu Basaveshwara Industries until the disposal of the writ petition.

Procedural History

The respondent filed W.P.No.103642/2015 before the High Court of Karnataka seeking to quash an order dated 18.03.2015 and for a mandamus to handover possession of assets. The learned Single Judge passed an interim order on 12.05.2015 directing the appellant to handover possession. The appellant filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 on the same day. The appeal was heard on 21.05.2015 and allowed.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind in Grounds of Detention. The court held that failure to specify the period of detention in the grounds and non-consideration of representation by the detaining au...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by KSFC Against Interim Order to Handover Possession of Seized Assets — Writ Appeal Maintainable Under Section 4 of Karnataka High Court Act, 1961 Against Interim Order in Writ Petition