High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals in Central Sales Tax Assessment Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration. The court set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and directed the assessing authority to pass a fresh order after hearing the appellant under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, ABB India Ltd., formerly known as ABB Limited, is engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of electrical/electronic products and execution of work contracts for transmission and distribution of electricity. The dispute in these writ appeals relates to the assessment period April 2013 to March 2014 under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. For certain inter-state sales during that period, the appellant charged and deposited lesser tax. The appellant filed writ petitions before the High Court, which were dismissed by the learned Single Judge. Aggrieved, the appellant filed these writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The Division Bench heard the appeals at the admission stage with the consent of both parties. The court set aside the order passed in the writ petitions and remanded the matter to the assessing authority for fresh consideration, directing that the appellant be given an opportunity of hearing before passing a fresh order. The appeals were disposed of accordingly.

Headnote

A) Central Sales Tax - Assessment - Levy of Tax on Inter-State Sales - Sections 8, 9, Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 - The dispute pertained to the assessment period April 2013 to March 2014 under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. The appellant, engaged in manufacture and sale of electrical/electronic products and execution of work contracts, had charged and deposited lesser tax on certain inter-state sales. The court, after hearing both sides, set aside the impugned order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, directing the assessing authority to pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the period April 2013 to March 2014 was validly passed and whether the appellant was entitled to relief against the levy of tax on inter-state sales.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeals are allowed. The order passed in the writ petitions is set aside. The matter is remanded to the assessing authority for fresh consideration. The assessing authority shall pass a fresh order after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant.

Law Points

  • Central Sales Tax Act
  • 1956
  • Section 8
  • Section 9
  • Section 3
  • Inter-State Sales
  • Levy of Tax
  • Remand
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2015 LawText (KAR) (04) 23

W.A.Nos.1098-1109/2015 (T-RES)

2015-03-20

Vineet Saran, S Sujatha

K.P.Kumar (Senior Counsel), Suryanarayana T (Advocate) for appellant; K.M.Shivayogiswamy (AGA) for respondent

ABB India Ltd (formerly known as ABB Limited)

The Deputy Commissioner of Commercial Taxes (Audit)-6.2, DVO-06

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ appeals against the order of the learned Single Judge dismissing writ petitions challenging assessment under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Remedy Sought

Setting aside of the order passed in the writ petitions and remand for fresh consideration.

Filing Reason

The appellant challenged the assessment order for the period April 2013 to March 2014 under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956, wherein lesser tax was charged and deposited on certain inter-state sales.

Previous Decisions

The learned Single Judge dismissed the writ petitions (W.P.8711-22/15) on 5/3/2015.

Issues

Whether the assessment order under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956 for the period April 2013 to March 2014 was validly passed.

Submissions/Arguments

Sri K.P. Kumar, Senior Counsel for the appellant, argued for setting aside the order and remand. Sri K.M. Shivayogiswamy, learned AGA for the respondent, accepted notice and consented to disposal.

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the matter should be remanded for fresh consideration after giving an opportunity of hearing to the appellant, as the assessment order was challenged and the learned Single Judge's order was set aside.

Judgment Excerpts

With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, these appeals are being disposed of at the admission stage. The dispute in the present appeals relate to the assessment period April ’13 to March ’14 under the provisions of the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956.

Procedural History

The appellant filed writ petitions (W.P.8711-22/15) before the High Court, which were dismissed on 5/3/2015. Aggrieved, the appellant filed these writ appeals under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act. The appeals were heard at the admission stage and disposed of on 20/3/2015.

Acts & Sections

  • Central Sales Tax Act, 1956:
  • Karnataka High Court Act: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals in Central Sales Tax Assessment Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration. The court set aside the order of the learned Single Judge and directed the assessing authority to pass a fresh order after...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Expenditure Tax Case — Upholds ITAT's Admission of New Evidence. The court held that the CIT(A) and ITAT were justified in admitting the Director General (Exemption)'s order dated 31/7/2001 ...