Search Results for "Section 379 IPC"

226 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 226 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 324, 143, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case involves five criminal appeals arising from a common judgment of the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, dated 27-6-2013 in Sessions Tri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Prosecution for Illegal Sand Mining Under IPC and Mines Act. Police Investigation Not Barred by Section 22 of MMDR Act as Theft Under IPC is a Distinct Offence.

The Supreme Court dismissed an appeal by Kanwar Pal Singh, a director of M/s Kanwar Enterprises Pvt. Ltd., challenging his prosecution for illegal san...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Confirms Death Sentence for Rape and Murder of 7½-Year-Old Mentally Challenged Girl. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen, Recovery, and Medical Reports Established Guilt Beyond Doubt; Aggravating Factors Outweighed Mitigating Factors.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeals of Manoj Pratap Singh, upholding his conviction and death sentence for the kidnapping, rape, and murder of a 7...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Conspiracy. Conviction under Section 302 IPC with Sections 34, 114, 120B IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances complete and motive established.

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals by Vidyalakshmi @ Vidya (A3) and Anand Sabariraj @ Anand (A1) and another (A2) against the common judgment of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dissolves Marriage Under Article 142 in Transfer Petition Due to Irretrievable Breakdown and Allows Transfer of Proceedings

The marriage between the parties, solemnised in 2012, survived only for a brief period, after which they began living separately. For more than thirte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...