High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Petition to Transfer Child Custody Case from Bengaluru to Belagavi Under Section 24 CPC. Wife's Convenience and Child's Education in Bengaluru Outweigh Husband's Financial Hardship Claim.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: KALABURAGI In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner-husband filed a petition under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking transfer of Child Custody Proceeding G & WC No.229/2016 from the Court of III Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to the Family Court, Belagavi. The marriage was solemnized on 12.08.2009, and a male child named Vikhyath was born on 26.07.2010. The petitioner claimed that after marriage, the couple moved to Chennai and later to Bengaluru, where he started his own clinic with financial assistance from his parents. He alleged that the respondent-wife left the matrimonial home in 2014 and filed a false complaint, and that he faced financial hardship and inconvenience in traveling to Bengaluru for the proceedings. The respondent-wife opposed the transfer, stating that she resides in Bengaluru with the child, who is studying there, and that the petitioner has sufficient means to travel. The court held that the convenience of the wife, who has custody of the minor child, and the welfare of the child are paramount considerations. The petitioner failed to make out a case for transfer, and the petition was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Transfer of Proceedings - Section 24 CPC - Child Custody - Transfer of G & WC No.229/2016 from III Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to Family Court, Belagavi - The husband-petitioner sought transfer on grounds of convenience and financial hardship, but the court found that the wife-respondent, who is the mother and has custody of the minor child, resides in Bengaluru and the child's education is there - Held that the convenience of the wife and welfare of the child are paramount, and the petition was dismissed (Paras 1-8).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the child custody proceeding pending before the Family Court at Bengaluru should be transferred to the Family Court at Belagavi under Section 24 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is dismissed. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 24 CPC
  • Transfer of proceedings
  • Child custody
  • Welfare of child
  • Convenience of parties
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (10) 5

C.P. No.100179/2016

2017-10-06

Sreenivas Harish Kumar

Sri Nitin R Bolabandi (for petitioner), Sri Biju V. (for respondent)

Shri. Dr. Vishal Khakhandaki

Smt. Dr. Ashwini Khakhandaki

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil petition under Section 24 CPC for transfer of child custody proceeding from Family Court, Bengaluru to Family Court, Belagavi.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner-husband sought transfer of G & WC No.229/2016 from III Addl. Prl. Judge, Family Court, Bengaluru to Family Court, Belagavi.

Filing Reason

Petitioner claimed financial hardship and inconvenience in traveling to Bengaluru for the child custody proceeding.

Issues

Whether the child custody proceeding should be transferred from Bengaluru to Belagavi under Section 24 CPC.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that he is a medical practitioner in Belagavi, his parents are aged and dependent, he faces financial hardship, and the respondent-wife left the matrimonial home and filed a false complaint. Respondent argued that she resides in Bengaluru with the minor child who is studying there, the petitioner has sufficient means to travel, and the transfer would cause inconvenience to the child's education.

Ratio Decidendi

In a transfer petition under Section 24 CPC, the convenience of the wife who has custody of the minor child and the welfare of the child are paramount considerations. The petitioner failed to establish a strong case for transfer.

Judgment Excerpts

This is a petition under Section 24 of C.P.C. seeking transfer of Child Custody Proceeding, G. & WC. No.229/2016 from the Court of III Addl. Prl. Judge, Bengaluru, to Family Court, Belagavi. The convenience of the wife who has custody of the minor child and the welfare of the child are paramount considerations.

Procedural History

The petition was filed on an unspecified date, heard and reserved for orders on 15.09.2017, and pronounced on 06.10.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: Section 24
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Husband's Petition to Transfer Child Custody Case from Bengaluru to Belagavi Under Section 24 CPC. Wife's Convenience and Child's Education in Bengaluru Outweigh Husband's Financial Hardship Claim.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to Furnish Bail Application and Order Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 3 of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.