High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Workmen Compensation Case — Heart Attack During Employment Held as Accidental Injury Arising Out of Employment. The court confirmed that a heart attack suffered by a lorry driver while driving during employment is an accidental injury under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co., Ltd. challenging the judgment and award dated 13.04.2010 passed by the Labour Officer and Commissioner for Workmen Compensation, Chitradurga, in CWC/WCA/F/CR-8/2007. The Commissioner had awarded compensation of Rs.3,84,280/- with interest at 12% p.a. to the claimants, who are the dependents of the deceased workman A.R. Anjan Kumar @ A.R. Anjaneya. The deceased was a driver of a lorry (No. KA.16/B-7862) owned by respondent No.4. On the date of the incident, while driving the lorry, he suffered a heart attack (Acute Myocardial Infarction) and died. The claimants contended that the heart attack occurred during the course of employment due to the strain of driving. The Insurance Company argued that a heart attack is not an 'accidental injury' under the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923, and that there was no evidence of any strain or stress beyond normal work. The court, after considering the evidence and the circumstances, held that the heart attack was caused by the strain of driving and the stress of employment, and thus it is an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The court dismissed the appeal, confirming the award of compensation.

Headnote

A) Workmen Compensation - Accidental Injury - Heart Attack - Section 3 Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923 - The issue was whether a heart attack suffered by a workman while driving a lorry during employment constitutes an accidental injury arising out of and in the course of employment. The court held that the strain of driving and the stress of employment contributed to the heart attack, and thus it is an accidental injury under the Act. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a heart attack (Acute Myocardial Infarction) suffered by a workman during the course of his employment amounts to an 'accidental injury' arising out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal dismissed; award of compensation confirmed.

Law Points

  • Workmen Compensation
  • Accidental Injury
  • Heart Attack
  • Course of Employment
  • Arising Out of Employment
  • Section 3 Workmen's Compensation Act
  • 1923
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (12) 17

M.F.A.No.6580/2010(WC)

2018-12-17

H.P. Sandesh

Sri B C Seetharama Rao (for appellant), Sri R Shashidhara (for C/R1), Sri Govindappa J (for R4)

National Insurance Co., Ltd.

Smt. Renukamma, Kum. A R Rakshitha (deceased), Kum. A R Deeksha, Sri K Muzeeh Khan

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against award of compensation under Workmen's Compensation Act

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought to set aside the award of compensation

Filing Reason

Insurance Company challenged the Commissioner's finding that heart attack is an accidental injury

Previous Decisions

Commissioner for Workmen Compensation awarded Rs.3,84,280/- with interest

Issues

Whether a heart attack suffered during employment is an 'accidental injury' under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): Heart attack is not an accidental injury; no evidence of strain or stress beyond normal work. Respondents (Claimants): Heart attack occurred due to strain of driving during employment; it is an accidental injury.

Ratio Decidendi

A heart attack suffered by a workman during the course of employment, caused by the strain and stress of the work, constitutes an 'accidental injury' arising out of and in the course of employment under Section 3 of the Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923.

Judgment Excerpts

The Commissioner recording the evidence, allowed the claim petition granting compensation of Rs.3,84,280/- with interest at 12% p.a. after expiry of 30 days from the date of the incident.

Procedural History

Claim petition filed before Commissioner for Workmen Compensation; award passed on 13.04.2010; Insurance Company filed appeal under Section 30(1) of the Act on 17.12.2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923: Section 3, Section 30(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Partially Allows Petition Against Interim Maintenance Award in Family Dispute — Reduces Maintenance for Wife and Child Based on Income and Needs. The court assessed the husband's income from multiple sources and considered the wif...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Bombay at Goa Quashes Criminal Complaints for Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC — Directors of Government Company Held to be Public Servants. Prosecution under Section 138 NI Act Without Prior Sanction is Not Maintainable.