High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employee's Appeal in Transfer Dispute — Upholds Termination for Disobedience. Employee Failed to Comply with Transfer Order and Did Not Respond to Show Cause Notices, Leading to Termination.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: DHARWAD In Favour of Prosecution
  • 102
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Sri. Angadi Vrushabha, was employed as a Field Officer with the 4th respondent bank, P.C.A. & R.D. Bank Ltd., Huvinahadagali. He was issued a transfer order which he failed to obey. Consequently, a notice was issued on 22.03.2003, followed by a show cause notice on 13.05.2003 and a final notice on 13.06.2003. The appellant did not respond to any of these notices. As a result, the competent authority terminated his services. Aggrieved, the appellant filed a writ petition before the Single Judge, which was dismissed on 16.03.2017. The appellant then filed this intra-court appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961. The Division Bench heard the appeal. The appellant's counsel argued that the appellant had worked for 30 years and that the termination was disproportionate. However, the court noted that the appellant had not challenged the transfer order and had failed to respond to the notices. The court held that the appellant's conduct amounted to abandonment of service and that he was not entitled to any relief. The appeal was dismissed.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Transfer - Disobedience - Termination - The appellant, an employee of a co-operative bank, was transferred but failed to report to duty. Despite multiple notices, he did not respond. The competent authority terminated his services. The Single Judge dismissed his writ petition. The Division Bench upheld the dismissal, holding that the appellant's conduct amounted to abandonment of service and he was not entitled to reinstatement. (Paras 2-3)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the appellant is entitled to reinstatement after failing to comply with a transfer order and not responding to show cause notices.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ appeal is dismissed. The order of the Single Judge dated 16.03.2017 in W.P.No.60030/2011 is confirmed.

Law Points

  • Transfer order
  • Employee disobedience
  • Show cause notice
  • Termination
  • Reinstatement
  • Writ appeal
  • Karnataka High Court Act
  • 1961 Section 4
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2019 LawText (KAR) (03) 30

Writ Appeal No. 100553 of 2017 (S-RES)

2019-03-08

G. Narendar, Bellunke A.S.

Sri. Nagaraj J Appannavar, Sri. Laxman T Mantagani (for appellant); Sri. Ravi V Hosamani (AGA for R1); Sri. R. H. Angadi, Sri. N. C. Patil (for R3)

Sri. Angadi Vrushabha S/o Late Mahantappa

The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bengaluru & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Intra-court appeal against dismissal of writ petition challenging termination of employment.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought setting aside of the Single Judge's order and allowance of the writ appeal.

Filing Reason

Appellant was terminated for failing to comply with a transfer order and not responding to show cause notices.

Previous Decisions

Single Judge dismissed W.P.No.60030/2011 on 16.03.2017.

Issues

Whether the appellant's termination was justified for disobeying transfer order and not responding to notices. Whether the appellant is entitled to reinstatement.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant's counsel argued that the appellant had worked for 30 years and termination was disproportionate. Respondents argued that the appellant failed to comply with transfer order and did not respond to notices.

Ratio Decidendi

An employee who fails to comply with a transfer order and does not respond to show cause notices abandons service and is not entitled to reinstatement.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant has failed to respond to any of the notices. Hence, the Competent Authority has passed the order of termination. The appellant has not challenged the transfer order. He has not responded to the notices. Hence, we do not find any merit in the appeal.

Procedural History

The appellant was terminated by the employer. He filed W.P.No.60030/2011 before the Single Judge, which was dismissed on 16.03.2017. He then filed this writ appeal under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961.

Acts & Sections

  • Karnataka High Court Act, 1961: Section 4
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment in Favor of Plaintiff Partnership Firm in Suit for Recovery of Outstanding Amounts Under Order XXXVII CPC. Defendant's Application for Leave to Defend Rejected Due to Lack of Triable Issues and Failure to Dis...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Employee's Appeal in Transfer Dispute — Upholds Termination for Disobedience. Employee Failed to Comply with Transfer Order and Did Not Respond to Show Cause Notices, Leading to Termination.