High Court of Karnataka Quashes Age-Limit Proviso for MBBS/BDS Admission in Karnataka NEET UG 2018 — Discriminatory Cut-Off Date Violates Article 14. The proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018, fixing 31st December 2018 as the cut-off for completing 17 years of age, was held arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU In Favour of Accused
  • 7
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mylepalle Vaibhavi, a candidate who registered with the Karnataka Examinations Authority for admission to MBBS/BDS courses for the academic year 2018-19, challenged the validity of the proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018. The proviso required that candidates must have completed 17 years of age on or before 31st December 2018. The petitioner, born on 2nd January 2002, would not meet this cut-off and thus was rendered ineligible. The court examined whether this cut-off date was arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution. The court observed that the requirement of minimum age for medical admission is to ensure maturity, but fixing a cut-off date of 31st December 2018 had no reasonable nexus to the object. It discriminated between candidates born just before and after that date. The court also noted that the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and regulations require age to be computed as of the date of admission or as prescribed. The court quashed the proviso and directed that the age requirement be computed as of the date of admission or as per the applicable regulations, thereby allowing the petition.

Headnote

A) Constitutional Law - Right to Equality - Article 14 - Age Discrimination - The proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018 prescribed that candidates must have completed 17 years of age on or before 31st December 2018. The court held that this cut-off date was arbitrary and discriminatory as it treated candidates born after 31st December 2001 differently from those born before, without any reasonable nexus to the object of ensuring minimum age for medical education. The court quashed the proviso and directed that the age requirement be computed as of the date of admission or as per the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956. (Paras 1-5)

B) Medical Education - Admission Age Requirement - Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 33 - The court noted that the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and regulations thereunder require a candidate to have completed 17 years of age on or before the date of admission or such other date as may be prescribed. The impugned proviso fixing 31st December 2018 as the cut-off was held to be inconsistent with the statutory scheme and therefore invalid. (Paras 3-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018, which prescribes a cut-off date of 31st December 2018 for determining the age of candidates for MBBS/BDS admission, is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The writ petition is allowed. The proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018 is quashed. The respondents are directed to consider the age eligibility of candidates as per the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and regulations, i.e., the candidate must have completed 17 years of age on or before the date of admission or such other date as may be prescribed.

Law Points

  • Article 226 of the Constitution of India
  • Article 14
  • Age discrimination
  • Reasonable classification
  • Medical admissions
  • Cut-off date
  • Karnataka Examinations Authority
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (07) 60

Writ Petition No.29201/2018 (EDN-CET)

2018-07-12

H.G.Ramesh, Mohammad Nawaz

Sri Ajoy Kumar Patil (for petitioner), Sri N.K.Ramesh (for R1 & R2), Sri Udaya Holla, Advocate General a/w Sri Shivaprabhu S. Hiremath, AGA (for R3 & R4)

Mylepalle Vaibhavi

Karnataka Examinations Authority, The Administrative Officer, The State of Karnataka, Directorate of Medical Education

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging the validity of a proviso in the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018 regarding age eligibility for MBBS/BDS admission.

Remedy Sought

Quashing of the proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018.

Filing Reason

The petitioner, born on 2nd January 2002, was rendered ineligible for MBBS/BDS admission because the proviso required candidates to have completed 17 years of age on or before 31st December 2018.

Issues

Whether the proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018, fixing 31st December 2018 as the cut-off date for completing 17 years of age, is arbitrary and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the cut-off date of 31st December 2018 is arbitrary and discriminatory, as it treats candidates born after 31st December 2001 differently without any reasonable classification. Respondents argued that the cut-off date is fixed for administrative convenience and to ensure uniformity in age eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi

A cut-off date for age eligibility in medical admissions must have a reasonable nexus to the object sought to be achieved. Fixing a date unrelated to the academic year or admission process, such as 31st December, is arbitrary and violates Article 14. The age requirement must be computed as per the statutory provisions, i.e., as of the date of admission or as prescribed by the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956.

Judgment Excerpts

In this writ petition, petitioner who has registered with the Karnataka Examinations Authority for admission to MBBS/BDS courses has challenged the validity of the proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018. The proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Bulletin prescribes that the candidate should have completed 17 years of age on or before 31st December 2018. The said proviso is arbitrary and discriminatory and is violative of Article 14 of the Constitution of India. Accordingly, the proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018 is quashed. The respondents are directed to consider the age eligibility of the candidates as per the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 and the regulations made thereunder.

Procedural History

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. It came up for preliminary hearing in 'B' group on 12th July 2018, and the court disposed of the matter with the order.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 14, Article 226
  • Indian Medical Council Act, 1956: Section 33
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Quashes FIR Against In-Laws in Dowry Case Due to Lack of Specific Allegations. General and Omnibus Allegations Against Family Members Not Sufficient to Sustain Criminal Proceedings Under Section 498A IPC and Dowry Prohibition Act.
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Quashes Age-Limit Proviso for MBBS/BDS Admission in Karnataka NEET UG 2018 — Discriminatory Cut-Off Date Violates Article 14. The proviso to Clause 2.2 of Chapter 4 of the Karnataka State Information Bulletin UG NEET 2018, f...