High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Income Calculation. Tribunal's Award Modified as Notional Income of Deceased Reduced from Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 4,500 Per Month Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 6
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appeal was filed by the National Insurance Co. Ltd. under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the quantum of compensation awarded by the Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Tarikere in MVC No. 497/2014 dated 24.03.2016. The claimants, respondents 1 to 3, are the legal representatives of the deceased who died in a motor vehicle accident. The Tribunal awarded total compensation of Rs. 7,96,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. The insurance company challenged only the amount of Rs. 7,56,000/- awarded under the head 'loss of dependency', arguing that the Tribunal erred in taking the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 6,000 without any evidence, whereas the claimants had claimed only Rs. 4,500 per month. The High Court found merit in this contention and reduced the notional monthly income to Rs. 4,500. Applying multiplier '13' (based on the deceased's age of 50 years) and deducting 1/3rd towards personal expenses, the loss of dependency was recalculated as Rs. 4,68,000/-. Adding conventional heads of Rs. 40,000/- (loss of consortium, loss of estate, funeral expenses), the total compensation was reduced to Rs. 5,08,000/-. The interest rate of 6% p.a. was upheld. The appeal was partly allowed.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Loss of Dependency - Income Calculation - The Tribunal erred in taking the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 6,000 without any evidence, whereas the claimants had claimed Rs. 4,500 per month. The High Court reduced the notional income to Rs. 4,500 per month. (Paras 4-5)

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Multiplier - The Tribunal applied multiplier '13' based on the age of the deceased (50 years), but the correct multiplier as per Sarla Verma v. DTC is '13' for age 50-55. The High Court upheld the multiplier. (Para 5)

C) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Deduction for Personal Expenses - The Tribunal deducted 1/3rd towards personal expenses, which is correct for a bachelor. The High Court upheld this deduction. (Para 5)

D) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Interest Rate - The Tribunal awarded interest at 6% p.a., which is reasonable and not interfered with. (Para 6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal under the head 'loss of dependency' is excessive and requires reduction.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal partly allowed. The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is reduced from Rs. 7,96,000/- to Rs. 5,08,000/-. The interest rate of 6% p.a. is upheld. The insurance company is directed to deposit the reduced compensation with accrued interest within four weeks.

Law Points

  • Quantum of compensation
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 173(1)
  • Income calculation
  • Multiplier
  • Deduction for personal expenses
  • Interest rate
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (KAR) (01) 14

M.F.A. No. 5465 of 2016 (MV)

2018-01-09

K. Somashekar

Smt. Manjula N. Tejaswi for appellant; Sri. Srikanth N.V. for Sri. Sachin B.S. for respondents 1 to 3

The Manager, National Insurance Co. Ltd.

T. Chandranaika, T. Shekarnaika, Takranaika, Balakrishna, B. Ramesha

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeal against quantum of compensation in motor accident claim

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation awarded by Tribunal

Filing Reason

Insurance company challenged the quantum of compensation, specifically the amount of Rs. 7,56,000/- awarded under loss of dependency, on the ground that the Tribunal erred in taking monthly income of deceased as Rs. 6,000 without evidence

Previous Decisions

Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Tarikere awarded Rs. 7,96,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. in MVC No. 497/2014 dated 24.03.2016

Issues

Whether the Tribunal erred in taking the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 6,000 without any evidence? Whether the compensation awarded under loss of dependency is excessive?

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant (Insurance Company): The Tribunal erred in taking the monthly income of the deceased as Rs. 6,000 without any evidence, whereas the claimants had claimed only Rs. 4,500 per month. The compensation under loss of dependency is excessive. Respondents (Claimants): The compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper.

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of evidence, the notional income of the deceased should be taken as claimed by the claimants (Rs. 4,500 per month) and not a higher amount without basis. The multiplier and deduction for personal expenses as per settled law are correct.

Judgment Excerpts

The only ground of challenge in this appeal is regarding the amount of Rs.7,56,000/- which has been awarded under the head 'loss of dependency'. The Tribunal has taken the monthly income of the deceased as Rs.6,000/- without any evidence. The claimants have claimed that the deceased was earning Rs.4,500/- per month. In the absence of any evidence, the notional income of the deceased is taken as Rs.4,500/- per month.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MVC No. 497/2014 before the Senior Civil Judge & MACT, Tarikere, which awarded compensation on 24.03.2016. The insurance company appealed under Section 173(1) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the High Court of Karnataka.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Partly Allows Insurance Company's Appeal Reducing Compensation in Motor Accident Claim Due to Erroneous Income Calculation. Tribunal's Award Modified as Notional Income of Deceased Reduced from Rs. 6,000 to Rs. 4,500 Per Month...
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Property Dispute Over Lease Deed Validity — Lease Deed Held to Be Valid and Binding Despite Lack of Registration Under Section 107 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Court restored the trial court's decree for pos...