Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Law Case — Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Held that termination without disciplinary inquiry and without affording opportunity of hearing is illegal and unsustainable.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: KOLHAPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 2
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Smt. Vanita Rajendra Bhadule (also known as Vanita Somnath Dikole), was employed as a clerk at Venutai Chavan College, Karad, which is run by Shri Shivaji Education Society. She was terminated from service without any disciplinary inquiry or show cause notice. Aggrieved, she filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Kolhapur under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. The petitioner contended that her termination was arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice. The respondents, including the State of Maharashtra and the college authorities, argued that the termination was justified due to certain irregularities. The court examined the facts and found that no disciplinary inquiry was conducted before termination. The court held that termination without affording an opportunity of hearing is illegal and unsustainable. The court allowed the writ petition, set aside the termination order, and directed reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits. The court also imposed costs on the respondents.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Termination - Natural Justice - Audi Alteram Partem - Constitution of India, Article 226 - Petitioner was terminated from service without any disciplinary inquiry or show cause notice - Court held that termination without affording opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and set aside the termination - Held that the petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits (Paras 1-28).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the termination of the petitioner from service without holding a disciplinary inquiry and without affording an opportunity of hearing is legal and sustainable.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ petition allowed. Termination order set aside. Petitioner directed to be reinstated with continuity of service and consequential benefits. Costs imposed on respondents.

Law Points

  • Natural Justice
  • Audi Alteram Partem
  • Termination without inquiry
  • Service Law
  • Writ Jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (06) 119

Writ Petition [Stamp] No. 18703 of 2024

2026-06-25

Milind N. Jadhav, Nandesh S. Deshpande

Mr. Sagar Mane for petitioner, Mr. B.V. Samant Additional G.P. a/w Mr. V.M. Mali for Respondents-State

Smt. Vanita Rajendra Bhadule (Aka. Vanita Somnath Dikole)

The State of Maharashtra through Secretary, Higher and Technical Education Department, Hon'ble Minister of Education, The Director of Education, The Deputy Director of Education, Shri Shivaji Education Society, Venutai Chavan College Karad, The State of Maharashtra School Education And Sports Department Deputy Director of Education

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging termination from service without disciplinary inquiry.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of termination order and reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was terminated from service without any show cause notice or disciplinary inquiry, violating principles of natural justice.

Issues

Whether termination without disciplinary inquiry and without affording opportunity of hearing is legal and sustainable.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that termination was arbitrary and violative of natural justice as no inquiry was held. Respondents argued that termination was justified due to irregularities.

Ratio Decidendi

Termination of an employee without holding a disciplinary inquiry and without affording an opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice and cannot be sustained. The employee is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits.

Judgment Excerpts

Termination without affording opportunity of hearing is violative of principles of natural justice. Petitioner is entitled to reinstatement with continuity of service and consequential benefits.

Procedural History

Petitioner filed writ petition before Bombay High Court at Kolhapur challenging termination order. Reserved on 18th June 2026, pronounced on 25th June 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Service Law Case — Termination Set Aside for Violation of Natural Justice. Held that termination without disciplinary inquiry and without affording opportunity of hearing is illegal and unsustainable.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Cooperative Bank Director Due to 18-Year Delay. Inordinate Delay Violates Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21 of Constitution, Proceedings Quashed as Abuse of Process.