Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Earned Leave Encashment in Service Matter — Directs Payment with Interest for Retired Lecturer. Petitioner entitled to encashment of 300 days earned leave under Pune University Statute 424(c) and University Circular, with interest at 6% per annum from date of retirement.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 1
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Mrs. P. G. Limaye, was a lecturer (Senior Scale) in Statistics at Fergusson College, Pune, which is established and administered by the Deccan Education Society (respondent No.1). She served from 15 June 1973 to 30 April 2005, when she retired upon attaining superannuation. The petitioner claimed that under the Rules and Regulations of the Pune University Statutes, particularly Statute 424(c) and University Circular No. CCO 627 dated 7 July 2005, she was entitled to earned leave up to a minimum of 300 days, which should have been credited to her service book by the Principal. She made several representations for encashment of the earned leave but was not paid. Consequently, she filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a mandamus directing the respondents to pay the amount of encashment of earned leave for 300 days with interest at 21% per annum from the date of retirement (1 May 2005) till realization. The court considered the facts and the applicable statutes. The court noted that the petitioner was entitled to the benefit as per the statutes and circular. The court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay the amount of encashment of earned leave for 300 days with interest at 6% per annum from the date of retirement till the date of actual payment. The court also directed that the payment be made within eight weeks from the date of the order.

Headnote

A) Service Law - Earned Leave Encashment - Entitlement to Leave Encashment - Pune University Statute 424(c) and University Circular No. CCO 627 dated 7 July 2005 - Petitioner, a retired lecturer, claimed encashment of 300 days earned leave. Court held that the petitioner is entitled to encashment of earned leave as per the applicable statutes and circular, and directed payment with interest at 6% per annum from the date of retirement till realization. (Paras 1-4)

B) Constitutional Law - Writ of Mandamus - Enforcement of Service Benefits - Article 226 of the Constitution of India - Petitioner sought mandamus for payment of leave encashment. Court allowed the petition and directed the respondents to pay the amount with interest. (Paras 1, 4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to encashment of earned leave for 300 days along with interest from the date of retirement.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The respondents are directed to pay the amount of encashment of earned leave for 300 days to the petitioner with interest at 6% per annum from the date of retirement (1 May 2005) till the date of actual payment. The payment shall be made within eight weeks from the date of the order.

Law Points

  • Earned leave encashment is a statutory right
  • University Statute 424(c) governs leave entitlement
  • Interest on delayed payment of leave encashment
  • Mandamus for enforcement of service conditions
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2026 LawText (BOM) (06) 106

Writ Petition No. 8145 of 2009

2026-06-18

G. S. Kulkarni, Aarti Sathe

Mr. Girish Paryani for Petitioner, Ms. M. P. Thakur, AGP for State

Mrs. P. G. Limaye

The Secretary, Deccan Education Society & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking mandamus for payment of earned leave encashment.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought a writ of mandamus directing respondents to pay encashment of earned leave for 300 days with interest at 21% per annum from date of retirement.

Filing Reason

Petitioner was not paid encashment of earned leave despite being entitled under Pune University Statutes and circular.

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to encashment of earned leave for 300 days. Whether the petitioner is entitled to interest on delayed payment of leave encashment.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that under Pune University Statute 424(c) and University Circular No. CCO 627 dated 7 July 2005, she was entitled to earned leave encashment for 300 days. Respondents did not appear to have contested the claim as the judgment notes the facts and allows the petition.

Ratio Decidendi

The petitioner, having served for over 30 years, is entitled to encashment of earned leave as per the applicable statutes and circular. The respondents are liable to pay the amount with interest for the delay.

Judgment Excerpts

This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is filed praying for the following substantive relief: ... directing the Respondent no. 1 and Respondent no 2 to pay forthwith the amount of encashment of earned leave for 300 days alongwith interest @ 21% p.a. The facts lie in a narrow compass. The petitioner was in the service of Fergusson College at Pune as a Lecturer (Senior Scale) in Statistics... It is the petitioner's case that as per Rules and Regulations of the provisions of the Pune University Statutes governing the terms and conditions of service of teachers... she was entitled to Earned Leave up to a minimum of 300 days to her credit...

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Writ Petition No. 8145 of 2009 before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay seeking mandamus for payment of earned leave encashment. The petition was heard and disposed of on 18 June 2026.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Sugar Factory's Writ Petition Against Sugar Development Fund Loan Rejection — Held That Delay in Processing Application Cannot Be Ground for Rejection When Scheme Was Extended and Factory Was Eligible. The Court directed re...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petition for Earned Leave Encashment in Service Matter — Directs Payment with Interest for Retired Lecturer. Petitioner entitled to encashment of 300 days earned leave under Pune University Statute 424(c) and University Cir...