Madras High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Personal Dispute Case Following Compromise. Court exercises inherent power under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 448, 294(b), 352, 506(2) IPC after amicable settlement.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 23
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioners filed a Criminal Original Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (BNSS) seeking quashing of FIR in Crime No.438 of 2023 registered at Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station. The FIR was lodged by the second respondent (de-facto complainant) alleging that on 24.12.2023 at around 2:00 a.m., the petitioners went to his house demanding repayment of a loan. When refused, they allegedly abused him, pushed him causing strangulation of his neck, and threatened him with a knife. The FIR was registered for offences under Sections 448 (criminal trespass), 294(b) (obscene acts), 352 (assault), and 506(2) (criminal intimidation) of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC). During the pendency of the petition, the parties amicably settled the dispute and filed a Joint Memo of Compromise dated 15.11.2024. The petitioners and the second respondent appeared in person and were identified by the police and their counsel. The Court verified the compromise and found it to be genuine. The Court noted that the dispute was personal in nature and that the parties had compromised. Relying on the Supreme Court judgments in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641, the Court held that no useful purpose would be served by continuing the proceedings. Accordingly, the Court quashed the FIR and all consequential proceedings.

Headnote

A) Criminal Procedure - Quashing of FIR - Compromise in Personal Dispute - Sections 448, 294(b), 352, 506(2) IPC read with Section 528 BNSS - The petitioners sought quashing of FIR registered for offences including criminal trespass, obscene acts, assault, and criminal intimidation. The parties entered into a compromise and filed a joint memo. The Court, relying on Gian Singh v. State of Punjab and Parbatbhai Aahir v. State of Gujarat, held that where the dispute is personal and the parties have settled, the High Court can quash proceedings even for non-compoundable offences to secure the ends of justice. The FIR was quashed. (Paras 4-8)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the FIR can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties in a personal dispute involving non-compoundable offences.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The FIR in Crime No.438 of 2023 on the file of the first respondent police and all consequential proceedings are quashed.

Law Points

  • Compromise in personal disputes
  • Quashing of FIR
  • Inherent powers of High Court
  • Section 528 BNSS
  • Sections 448
  • 294(b)
  • 352
  • 506(2) IPC
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 345

Crl.O.P.(MD)No.19479 of 2024

2025-01-03

M.Nirmal Kumar

Mr.Arun Ramnath (for petitioners), Mr.K.Sanjai Gandhi (Government Advocate for R1), Mr.J.Jaaswant (for R2)

V.Tamilarasan and K.Sam Sachin

The Inspector of Police, Tirunelveli Taluk Police Station and M.Premkumar

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal Original Petition under Section 528 BNSS to quash FIR

Remedy Sought

Quashing of FIR in Crime No.438 of 2023

Filing Reason

Alleged offences under Sections 448, 294(b), 352, 506(2) IPC arising from a loan dispute

Previous Decisions

FIR registered on 24.12.2023; investigation pending

Issues

Whether the FIR can be quashed on the basis of a compromise between the parties in a personal dispute involving non-compoundable offences.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioners' counsel submitted that the parties have compromised and filed a joint memo of compromise. Respondents did not oppose the quashing.

Ratio Decidendi

Where the dispute is personal in nature and the parties have genuinely compromised, the High Court can quash criminal proceedings even for non-compoundable offences to secure the ends of justice, as per the guidelines in Gian Singh and Parbatbhai Aahir.

Judgment Excerpts

In the instant case, the dispute is of personal in nature and now the parties had compromised. Where the parties have compromised the matter, the High Court has power to quash the complaint for the offences under Sections 294(b) and 323 of IPC. In the light of the guidelines issued in the above said Judgments of the Hon'ble Apex Court, no useful purpose will be served in keeping the proceedings in Crime No.438 of 2023, pending before the first respondent Police.

Procedural History

FIR registered on 24.12.2023; petitioners filed Crl.O.P. under Section 528 BNSS for quashing; during pendency, parties compromised and filed joint memo on 15.11.2024; Court heard the matter on 03.01.2025 and quashed the FIR.

Acts & Sections

  • Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: 528
  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 448, 294(b), 352, 506(2)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Quashing of FIR in Personal Dispute Case Following Compromise. Court exercises inherent power under Section 528 BNSS to quash criminal proceedings for offences under Sections 448, 294(b), 352, 506(2) IPC after amicable settle...