Madras High Court Allows Passport Renewal Petition in Pending Criminal Case, Directs Petitioner to Seek Trial Court Permission. Right to Travel Abroad Recognized as Fundamental Right, Trial Court to Decide Application Within Three Weeks Unless Extraordinary Circumstances Exist.

High Court: Madras High Court In Favour of Accused
  • 4
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Arunkumar, held passport No. K3186577 and applied for its renewal on 21.11.2024. The Regional Passport Officer issued a communication on 26.11.2024 seeking explanation regarding a criminal case registered against him in Crime No.166 of 2021 at Gandhi Market Police Station. The petitioner then filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution seeking a mandamus to direct the passport officer to renew and re-issue the passport. During hearing, the Government Advocate submitted that the case had culminated in a charge sheet filed before the Additional Mahila Court, Trichy. The court heard all parties and perused the record. The court held that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right and the petitioner's career and avocation may be at stake if denied. It granted liberty to the petitioner to move the trial court for relief, directing that any such application be disposed of within three weeks. The trial court was directed to bear in mind the fundamental right and not deny relief unless extraordinary circumstances exist. The court also noted that the trial court could impose conditions to ensure prosecution is not stalled, including directing the petitioner to file an application under Section 228 of Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 by executing a special vakalat. Based on the trial court's order, the passport officer shall dispose of the renewal application. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Passport Law - Renewal of Passport - Pending Criminal Case - Right to Travel Abroad - The petitioner sought renewal of passport which was withheld due to a pending criminal case. The court held that the right to travel abroad is a fundamental right and directed the petitioner to approach the trial court for permission, which shall be granted unless extraordinary circumstances exist. The trial court may impose conditions to ensure prosecution is not stalled. (Paras 5-7)

B) Criminal Procedure - Section 228 Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Special Vakalat - The court observed that if necessary, the petitioner can be directed to file an application under Section 228 BNSS by executing a special vakalat to ensure his representation during trial. (Para 5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the petitioner is entitled to renewal and re-issuance of passport despite a pending criminal case against him.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Writ Petition allowed. Petitioner granted liberty to move the Additional Mahila Court, Trichy for relief. Trial court to dispose of any such application within three weeks, bearing in mind that right to travel abroad is a fundamental right. Based on trial court order, passport officer to dispose of renewal application. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Right to travel abroad is a fundamental right
  • Passport renewal pending criminal case
  • Section 228 BNSS
  • Writ of Mandamus
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (MAD) (01) 279

W.P.(MD)No.577 of 2025

2025-01-09

L.VICTORIA GOWRI

Mr.P.Muthuvijayapandian (Petitioner), Mr.C.Nandagopal (R1), Mr.K.Gnanasekaran (R2)

Arunkumar

1. The Regional Passport Officer, Regional Passport Office, New Municipal Complex, 7th Cross Thillai Nagar, Tiruchirappalli - 620 018. 2. The Inspector of Police, Gandhi Market Police Station, Trichy District.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ Petition seeking Mandamus for passport renewal

Remedy Sought

Direction to the Regional Passport Officer to renew and re-issue passport bearing No. K3186577 considering application dated 17.12.2024

Filing Reason

Passport renewal application was not processed due to pending criminal case in Crime No.166 of 2021

Issues

Whether the petitioner is entitled to renewal of passport despite a pending criminal case?

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner sought renewal of passport for travel abroad. Respondent police submitted that charge sheet has been filed in the criminal case.

Ratio Decidendi

The right to travel abroad is a fundamental right, and a pending criminal case does not automatically disentitle a person from passport renewal. The trial court should consider the application for permission to travel unless extraordinary circumstances exist, and may impose conditions to ensure prosecution is not stalled.

Judgment Excerpts

The learned Trial Judge shall bear in mind that right to travel abroad is a fundamental right and the petitioner's career and avocation may be at stake, if he is denied the right to go abroad. Therefore, the learned Trial Court, unless there are extraordinary circumstances, shall not deny such relief.

Procedural History

Petitioner applied for passport renewal on 21.11.2024. Passport officer sought explanation on 26.11.2024 regarding Crime No.166 of 2021. Petitioner filed W.P.(MD)No.577 of 2025 on 17.12.2024. Charge sheet was filed in the criminal case. Court heard the matter on 09.01.2025 and allowed the petition.

Acts & Sections

  • Constitution of India: Article 226
  • Bharatiya Nyaya Suraksha Sanhita, 2023: Section 228
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Allows Passport Renewal Petition in Pending Criminal Case, Directs Petitioner to Seek Trial Court Permission. Right to Travel Abroad Recognized as Fundamental Right, Trial Court to Decide Application Within Three Weeks Unless Extrao...
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging KSAT Order in Service Matter — Transfer of Assistant Director Upheld as Administrative Decision. Court holds that transfer orders are not subject to judicial review unless mala fides or vi...