Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Must Pay Third-Party Compensation Despite Cheque Dishonour. The court applied the 'pay and recover' principle under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, holding that the insurer's statutory liability to third parties is not extinguished by cancellation of the policy due to dishonour of the premium cheque.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Prosecution
  • 9
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident on 11/05/2007 where Nilesh Kshirsagar and his wife Sheetal died in a collision with a vehicle owned by respondent No.2. The offending vehicle was insured with ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd. The father of Nilesh and father-in-law of Sheetal filed two claim petitions under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara (M.A.C.P. No.219/2007 and M.A.C.P. No.229/2007). The Insurance Company contended that the owner had issued a cheque for Rs.9,195/- towards premium for the period 28/02/2007 to 27/02/2008, but the cheque was dishonoured due to insufficient funds. Consequently, the Insurance Company cancelled the cover note from its inception, arguing that there was no valid contract of insurance and thus no liability. The Tribunal, however, held the accident was due to rash and negligent driving and awarded compensation, directing the Insurance Company to pay. The Insurance Company appealed. The High Court framed the issue of whether the insurer is liable despite cheque dishonour. The court noted that under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, the insurer's liability to third parties is statutory and cannot be avoided merely by cancellation of the policy. Relying on precedents including the Supreme Court's decision in New India Assurance Co. Ltd. v. Rula (2000) 3 SCC 195, the court held that the insurer must pay the third-party claimants and then recover the amount from the insured owner. The appeals were dismissed, upholding the Tribunal's award but clarifying the insurer's right to recover.

Headnote

A) Motor Accident Claims - Third-Party Liability - Cheque Dishonour - Pay and Recover - The insurer is liable to pay compensation to third-party victims even if the premium cheque is dishonoured and the policy is cancelled, but the insurer can recover the amount from the insured owner - The court held that the insurer must satisfy the award and then recover from the owner, following the principle of 'pay and recover' (Paras 7-13).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether an insurance company is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants when the premium cheque issued by the insured is dishonoured and the cover note is cancelled ab initio.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Both appeals are dismissed. The Insurance Company is directed to pay the awarded compensation to the claimants and is entitled to recover the same from the insured owner in accordance with law.

Law Points

  • Insurance contract
  • cheque dishonour
  • third-party liability
  • pay and recover
  • Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
  • Section 166
  • Section 149
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 91

First Appeal No. 1945 of 2009 with First Appeal No. 1946 of 2009

2018-12-13

A. S. Chandurkar

Mr. Rajesh Kanojia i/b Res Juris for the Appellant, Mr. R.V. Bansode for Respondent No.1, Smt. Sheetal Mallikarjun Ubale for Respondent No.2

ICICI Lombard General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Sarjerao Pataloji Kshirsagar (deceased) through Legal Heir Nilima Raviraj Jadhav and Rajinder Harbhajan Singh

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against common judgment of Motor Accident Claims Tribunal awarding compensation for deaths in a motor accident.

Remedy Sought

Insurance Company sought to avoid liability to pay compensation on ground that premium cheque was dishonoured and policy cancelled.

Filing Reason

Insurance Company challenged Tribunal's award directing it to pay compensation despite dishonour of premium cheque.

Previous Decisions

Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara awarded compensation in M.A.C.P. No.219/2007 and M.A.C.P. No.229/2007, holding Insurance Company liable.

Issues

Whether the Insurance Company is liable to pay compensation to third-party claimants when the premium cheque is dishonoured and the cover note is cancelled ab initio.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant Insurance Company argued that since the cheque for premium was dishonoured, the cover note was cancelled from inception, and there was no valid contract of insurance, hence no liability. Respondent claimants argued that the Insurance Company is statutorily liable to third parties under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, and must pay compensation and then recover from the insured.

Ratio Decidendi

Under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, the insurer's liability to third parties is statutory and cannot be avoided by cancellation of the policy due to dishonour of the premium cheque. The insurer must pay the third-party claimants and then recover the amount from the insured owner.

Judgment Excerpts

The Insurance Company is liable to pay the amount of compensation to the third party claimants and thereafter recover the same from the insured owner. The principle of 'pay and recover' applies in such cases.

Procedural History

Claim petitions filed under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 before Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Satara. Tribunal awarded compensation. Insurance Company filed First Appeals No.1945/2009 and 1946/2009 before Bombay High Court. Appeals heard and dismissed on 13/12/2018.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: Section 166, Section 149
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Insurer Must Pay Third-Party Compensation Despite Cheque Dishonour. The court applied the 'pay and recover' principle under Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Waiver of Pre-deposit of Penalty and Interest in Property Tax Appeal Under Section 406(2)(e) of Maharashtra Municipal Corporation Act, 1949. The court held that the condition of deposit under Section 406(2)(e) applies only to...