Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Fail to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY In Favour of Accused
  • 37
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The appellant, Jarnail Aarjo Sardar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay in Sessions Case No. 603 of 2013 for an offence punishable under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 and sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 4 years and a fine of Rs. 1000/-. The case of the prosecution was that on 23rd March 2013, while the victim (daughter of complainant Ramdeo Yadav) was returning from college, the appellant assaulted her with a scissor, causing a grievous injury on her abdomen. The victim was taken to the hospital where sonography revealed an injury to her intestine requiring surgery. The father lodged a report based on the victim's statement, leading to the registration of Crime No. 171 of 2013 at Powai Police Station under Sections 307 and 506(II) IPC. The appellant was arrested on 30th March 2013, and a charge-sheet was filed. The prosecution examined 9 witnesses, including the victim (PW2), and two other witnesses (PW8 and PW9). The trial court convicted the appellant. On appeal, the High Court examined the evidence and found material inconsistencies. The victim's testimony was contradicted by medical evidence regarding the nature of the injury and the weapon used. The court noted that the prosecution failed to examine independent witnesses and that the victim's version was not corroborated by the medical report. The High Court held that the prosecution had not proved its case beyond reasonable doubt and accordingly allowed the appeal, setting aside the conviction and sentence.

Headnote

A) Criminal Law - Attempt to Murder - Section 307 Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Acquittal - The appellant was convicted for attempt to murder based on the testimony of the injured victim and other witnesses. The High Court found material inconsistencies in the prosecution case, including contradictions between the victim's testimony and medical evidence, and the absence of independent witnesses. Held that the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt, and the conviction was set aside (Paras 1-10).

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the conviction of the appellant under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

Appeal allowed. Conviction and sentence set aside. Appellant acquitted.

Law Points

  • Section 307 IPC
  • Attempt to murder
  • Acquittal
  • Benefit of doubt
  • Inconsistent evidence
  • Medical evidence
  • Witness credibility
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2018 LawText (BOM) (12) 77

Criminal Appeal No. 734 of 2014

2018-12-03

Smt. Sadhana S. Jadhav

Ms. Apeksha Vora (for appellant), Mr. S.H. Yadav (APP for State)

Jarnail Aarjo Sardar

State of Maharashtra

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Criminal appeal against conviction for attempt to murder.

Remedy Sought

Appellant sought acquittal by setting aside the conviction and sentence.

Filing Reason

Appellant was convicted under Section 307 IPC and sentenced to 4 years RI.

Previous Decisions

Trial court convicted the appellant in Sessions Case No. 603 of 2013.

Issues

Whether the conviction under Section 307 IPC is sustainable based on the evidence on record.

Submissions/Arguments

Appellant argued that the prosecution case was inconsistent and not proved beyond reasonable doubt. State argued that the victim's testimony was credible and supported by medical evidence.

Ratio Decidendi

The prosecution must prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Inconsistencies between the victim's testimony and medical evidence, and failure to examine independent witnesses, create doubt entitling the accused to acquittal.

Judgment Excerpts

The appellant herein is convicted for offence punishable under section 307 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to suffer R.I. for 4 years... The case rests upon the evidence of P.W. 2 i.e. the injured, P.W. 8 and P.W.9.

Procedural History

The appellant was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Gr. Bombay in Sessions Case No. 603 of 2013. He appealed to the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

Acts & Sections

  • Indian Penal Code, 1860: 307, 506(II)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 307 IPC Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Witness Testimony Fail to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 127 of MRTP Act – Failure to Acquire Within Ten Years. Reservation of land for public purpose lapses as acquiring body failed to take steps within prescribed period under Section 12...